A king instead of a president in US?

I think we should have a king instead of a president, Now you have policitians that do things to keep there jobs, instead of whats right. A king would stop senior cit from driving longer than they should, a king would kick out the Illegal aliens and give the work to the poor and unemployed. A king wouldnt let big oil tell him what to do. A king would not be scared off by congress or by anti-whatever groups. Its time someone does whats right instead of whats right to keep my job. What do u think?

Asked By: Primony - 6/13/2008
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
I've been thinking this for years. Get rid of all the bureaucracy!!
Answered By: stan t - 6/13/2008
Additional Answers (24)
The monarchy system will never work in the US.
Answered By: Keelo Lulu - 6/13/2008
Unconstitutional. Do you have an amendment in mind?
Answered By: Mark D - 6/13/2008
Answered By: DAR - 6/13/2008
This king you're talking about would have too much power. And how do you know that they would want to do all this?
Answered By: guitarace372 - 6/13/2008
*hides the Constitution* Why do you live in America?
Answered By: toms1266 - 6/13/2008
i agree with the guy above me
Answered By: flatpack - 6/13/2008
We had a king his name was George Bush the 2nd.
Answered By: Howard P - 6/13/2008
You cant compare a king to a president, it all depends on who's appointed to look after all of us. Saudia arabia has a king everyone there is far from sane and happy.
Answered By: Kat - 6/13/2008
Uh did you just come to us from the 1700s? We had a king before- sure he was overseas but technically we had a king- if you forgot he was a tyrant- hence the revolutionary war...
Answered By: Rabbyt - 6/13/2008
i would stay with a president cause a king has all power and can do crazy things like tortures or some shit a president has limited power its not about president or king its about WHO IS president or king
Answered By: samme b - 6/13/2008
England has a Queen and they have tons of illegals, the Queen bows to Parliament. Try another example....this one was too easy to debunk.
Answered By: nature lover - 6/13/2008
Uh...ok...why did the US fight the American Revolution again? I can see Dubya Bush going to Queen Elizabeth now....'Our bad....we wanna....join the English and get a King. I'll be King so noone can ever take my job. Yup. We'll be in Iraq for another Eleventeen years'
Answered By: Stupid Flanders - 6/13/2008
yeah i do believe the constitution of america has an article that does not allow a monarchy in the united states. so this idea or dream of yours would have to be put as an admendment in our DEMOCRATIC constitution.
Answered By: bballer - 6/13/2008
Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. It would only be a matter of time when the king would turn into a tyrant.
Answered By: Martini61 - 6/13/2008
Take for example the Queen of England, what power does she have? Zero. She is just a symbolic figure with a fat pay cheque, similar to our president.
Answered By: William V - 6/13/2008
One of the points our country's founders made was that when an individual can take a country to war, it's a tyranny. We've had that and a lot more; having a king wouldn't improve the situation, it would (if possible) make it worse.
Answered By: N. Cognito - 6/13/2008
George Bush is generally known in the UK as a King / President so the change would seem to be superfluous.
Answered By: Al Sepert - 6/13/2008
King=Dictator. I bet you'd feel pretty stupid if we had another Hitler on our hands. Oh wait... we do. But he's almost out of office.
Answered By: skitt1234 - 6/13/2008
Constitutional monarchies have worked for countries like Britain and Japan (mostly).
Answered By: Deuce - 6/13/2008
It was the heavy-handedness of the English monarchy that caused the American revolution in the first place. If a ruler is all-powerful, there's no guarantee that he or she would be benevolent to the subjects. After all, it's good to be the king... More
Answered By: Gerry R - 6/13/2008
There are several reasons this wouldn't work. I can think of a few... More
Answered By: hegstage - 6/13/2008
Why not? And if things go wrong, no need to wait 4 years to get rid of him: we just behead him. Bring on the guillotine!
Answered By: dyl - 6/13/2008
Think about what?
Answered By: rustonboomer - 6/13/2008
YES THAT WOULD WORK....if you believe in the tooth fairy and Loch Ness Monster i guess... More
Answered By: mattimusprime7 - 6/13/2008
Sponsored results
Over 483 Local Jobs Now Hiring In Your Area. $18-$87/Hr - Apply Today!
Click. Search. Apply. Free!
Jobs hiring near your local area. Part-time, Full-time, Work at home.
Sobre 287 Trabajos en tu area. $15-87/hora - Aplica Ahora.

Other Career Questions

What is your current job? Why did you choose this job? What do you enjoy about your job? What do you dislike about your job? What would be your perfect job? Would you rather have this j...
3 answers - Asked By: drop pants not bombs!.♥ - 3/2/2010
Where are the jobs? Is productivity and globalization creating a permanent “recession” of jobs? My main issue is I am doing a paper for school and have no idea where to begin. I was hoping suggestions...
4 answers - Asked By: bayebd24【ツ】 - 11/21/2007
Hi ok im 19 and about to start college to do an acess course into a university. Ive been browsing through all the courses and im tottaly stuck! I thought politics but im scared ill end up with some r...
1 answers - Asked By: roseparkerly - 1/26/2009

Content is not owned or controlled by Monster. Any content concerns should be addressed with Yahoo!
Yahoo! Does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. Yahoo! Disclaimer.

Popular Articles

Best-Paying Work-from-Home Jobs Article Rating
It’s easier than ever to work from home. Of course, not every job is a mobile job, and some companies aren’t interested in having their employees work from home.
2013 Marketing Jobs Outlook Article Rating
The US may be facing another year of anemic hiring overall, but that won't be the case in the high-orbit world of multichannel, digital media marketing.
For Employers: Post Jobs | Search Resumes | Advertise
About Monster | Work for Monster | Advertise with Us | AdChoices | Partner with Us | Investor Relations | Social Media
Terms of Use | Privacy Center | Accessibility Center | Help | Security | Contact Us | Sitemap | Mobile
©2014 Monster - All Rights Reserved U.S. Patents No. 5,832,497; 7,599,930 B1; 7,827,125 and 7,836,060 MWW - Looking for Monster Cable? - V: 2014.1.40.24-212