Look, I am not entirely sure either way, but the people who make the case for 9/11 as an inside job have certainly raised many valid questions. The people arguing against 9/11 as an inside job generally are people who have left out established facts and/or are somehow tied to the Bush administration, which raises even more questions.
Things that disturb me include the following:
1.)There was a power down at the WTC in the week before 9/11, and there were numerous "workmen" "rewiring" various telecom wires, and from all accounts the building was wide open. Security was nill, and the owner of the WTC security just happened to be Bush's brother. People who worked at the WTC were uneasy about this as nothing like this had ever happened before at the WTC.
2.) Fact, a jet fuel fire cannot but hot enough to melt steel. This is a stone cold fact, and yet tons of melted steel was found, and the remains of the WTC continued to burn for weeks beneath the rubble at extreme temperatures.
3.) Fact, pictures of steel girders jutting from the ruins show 45 degree angle cuts, melted cuts, exactly like the cuts used in a controlled demo0. The edges clearly showed melted steel.
4.) Several hundred people who were in the WTC reported explosions throughout the building between the times of impact and collapse, including survivors of the basement explosions and those in the lobby where the windows were literally blow out. Several reporters, police, and firefighters also reported these explosions, and reports of such are in the archived news reports.
5.) The building's design makes the total failure of both buildings impossible, as the remain floors supported by steel should have stood even if the upper floors collapsed, and the upper floors if they did fail, should have tipped over the side, so say the majority of engineers and physicists
6.) Building 7, not heavily damaged, also miraculously collapsed. This Building was "pulled" (a term meaning a controlled demolition) by the orders of the owner, who happened to admit this on the infamous PBS special. Since it takes days to set the charges, how were they able to "pull" the building unless it was already wired with thermite?
7.) If we can't trust our governments to tell the truth, look at what many foreign nations' intelligence gathers and governments have said, most quietly and/or internally, but still you can find it. Too many have concluded that aspects of our government had to know about or be involved with 9'11. That's what even our allies have said, but you won't see that in our New Papers or on our TV.
8.) How is it possible that some of the 19 people supposedly involved in the hijackings are actually alive and documented living in their native countries? How is it that some of the supposedly dead passengers are also still alive? You don't hear about that in our news either. In fact, the wife of a government official is still to my knowledge living in Europe. She was confirmed dead (yep, DNA and everything, supposedly) but somehow magically she's not.
9.) How can our military fail to intercept even just the plane headed to the Pentagon? That level of incompetence is actually impossible, irregardless of the lies and explanations so far put forth. We had fighter jets literally sitting on the runway just outside Washington, DC and we had plenty of notice that the plane was on the way. What is up with that nonsense?
10.)There is more evidence that aspects of our government, who are documented as saying it would take "a new Pearl Harbor" to create their war on terror, were in on the 9/11 conspiracy than there is evidence that JFK was murdered via conspiracy.
I am a patriotic American who loves this nation. I believe with all my heart that there are valid questions to be asked and accounted for. The illegal removal of evidence from ground zero, the stonewalling of the Bush administration of an investigation, the linking of Iraq to 9/11, and the numerous volumes of evidence that was ignored leaves me to believe that someone, and most likely a large and powerful segment of out government, MAY have been involved in the planning and implementation of the 9/11 attacks. I say MAY. If not, then why not allow these questions to be independently investigated?
Will we ever know the truth? Probably not. This will just fester as the JFK conspiracy has. I just hope that the rumor of a yet to be named foreign government which has a collection of 9/11 physical evidence is true. After all, the story of what happened to the remains of the builds is a fascinating story in itself.
Just be open to the possibility that something is amiss. Avoid the right and the left, and make your own decisions.
As a middle of the road, centrist politically, the extremists tend to confuse the issues.
Answered By: Iamstitch2U - 7/20/2008