Is screening for cancer a giant con job?

Here's an article in the NYT about people who are diagnosed with cancer in midlife, and the trials they face after beating cancer. Many of them are impoverished, even driven into bankruptcy, by the high cost of their treatment and medications. Many of them survive cancer only to find out that doing so has made them unemployable. Employers, acting in their own rational self-interest, will not hire someone who hs had cancer, since they are afraid that person will drive up their health insurance costs. But hey, it's better than being dead, right? Now here comes the astounding part: "“Cancer used to be a disease that occurred after you retired, because that’s when you were diagnosed,” said Cathy J. Bradley, a health economist at Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center who has studied employment among cancer patients. “Now patients are getting that diagnosis early on, which is a good thing. . . .But I don’t think they or their employers are prepared for the tradeoff, which is that someone may be out of work for a long time.” In other words: these people had their lives ruined by being diagnosed with "cancers" which, according to the article, never would have bothered them until they were at the end of their lives anyway! The word "cancer" is one of the most emotionally laden words in the English language, but when a pathologist uses the word "cancer," all she means is a tiny growth of abnormal-looking cells, which may or may not be harmful. There is no evidence that getting screened for cancer helps people to live longer. The whole idea of screening for cancer was based on the hope -- that's all it ever was, a hope -- that there were cancers that were so deadly that by the time symptoms appeared, it was too late to do anything about it, BUT, which if detected sooner by the new imaging technology, could be successfully treated. There is no evidence that such cancers even exist. What we do know is that, if they do exist, they must be so rare as not to make a difference in survival rates. What screening for cancer does do is detect the presence of tiny "cancers" which never would have harmed the patient. And, as the article makes clear, a diagnosis of cancer can ruin your life. So is screening for cancer a giant con job? Cancer Survivors Struggle to Find Jobs, Study Finds" by Roni Caryn Rabin Should I Be Tested for Cancer? Maybe Not and Here's Why by H. Gilbert Welch, MD, MPH Worried Sick: a Prescription for Health in Overtreated America by Nortin M Hadler, MD A third-generation freethinker To Midnight Moon: You wrote: "I do know the earlier the better medically for the patient." Do you have any EVIDENCE for this, or is it something you just assume? ? You know, the five-year survival rate for prostate cancer (survival rate after detection) is 90%. In the UK, it's 40%. That would seem to be a point in favor of our health-care system, until you realize that the death rate for prostate cancer is EXACTLY THE SAME in both countries. There are two possible interpretations for this: 1) People are being diagnosed earlier, but dying at the same time, in which case the screening is useless, and/or 2) People are being diagnosed and treated for "cancers" that never would have bothered them. Either way, there is no evidence that agressive screening of asymptomatic patients saves lives. Prostatectomy can leave a man incontinent, impotent, or both. That's a hell of a price to pay for something that never would have bothered a person in his lifetime. To charna: If I have symptoms, I will have them checked out. I will not submit to screening when I have no symptoms. That is literally looking for trouble.

Asked By: xaptation - 2/18/2009
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
I dont know about all the technical stuff such as how early some cancers can be detected, but I do know the earlier the better medically for the patient... More
Answered By: midnightmoon - 2/18/2009
Additional Answers (2)
HMMM i have no idea. but it is thought provoking isnt it?
Answered By: learningsomethingnew - 2/18/2009
Okay. I get what you are saying but let me pose this question to you: If you went to the doctor for a physical and he found a mass on your testicle and said that it could be cancerous would you have it biopsied to find out? Lets say you do and unfortunately it is cancer and it is starting to spread through your entire... More
Answered By: charna g - 2/19/2009
Sponsored results
Over 483 Local Jobs Now Hiring In Your Area. $18-$87/Hr - Apply Today!
Click. Search. Apply. Free!
Jobs hiring near your local area. Part-time, Full-time, Work at home.
Sobre 287 Trabajos en tu area. $15-87/hora - Aplica Ahora.

Other Career Questions

What is your current job? Why did you choose this job? What do you enjoy about your job? What do you dislike about your job? What would be your perfect job? Would you rather have this j...
3 answers - Asked By: drop pants not bombs!.♥ - 3/2/2010
Where are the jobs? Is productivity and globalization creating a permanent “recession” of jobs? My main issue is I am doing a paper for school and have no idea where to begin. I was hoping suggestions...
4 answers - Asked By: bayebd24【ツ】 - 11/21/2007
Hi ok im 19 and about to start college to do an acess course into a university. Ive been browsing through all the courses and im tottaly stuck! I thought politics but im scared ill end up with some r...
1 answers - Asked By: roseparkerly - 1/26/2009

Content is not owned or controlled by Monster. Any content concerns should be addressed with Yahoo!
Yahoo! Does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. Yahoo! Disclaimer.

Popular Articles

Best-Paying Work-from-Home Jobs Article Rating
It’s easier than ever to work from home. Of course, not every job is a mobile job, and some companies aren’t interested in having their employees work from home.
2013 Marketing Jobs Outlook Article Rating
The US may be facing another year of anemic hiring overall, but that won't be the case in the high-orbit world of multichannel, digital media marketing.
For Employers: Post Jobs | Search Resumes | Advertise
About Monster | Work for Monster | Advertise with Us | AdChoices | Partner with Us | Investor Relations | Social Media
Terms of Use | Privacy Center | Accessibility Center | Help | Security | Contact Us | Sitemap | Mobile
©2014 Monster - All Rights Reserved U.S. Patents No. 5,832,497; 7,599,930 B1; 7,827,125 and 7,836,060 MWW - Looking for Monster Cable? - V: 2014.1.40.24-310