Would you consider this sufficient EVIDENCE to STOP Cap&Trade legislation in the Senate?

I'll present exhibits A, B, C, and D: The bill is called The American Clean Energy and Security Act. (aka HR 2454) A) The administration has chosen to ignore over 31,000 U.S. scientists who disagree with the "global warming" hypothesis As well as all the scientists that have dissented from United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore. B) The EPA suppressed contradicting evidence that concluded CO2 IS NOT the leading cause of planetary warming. (The REDACTED version of the report is the primary basis of current climate change legislation) The Competitive Enterprise Institute has obtained an EPA study of the "endangerment" to human well-being ostensibly caused by carbon dioxide emissions, together with a set of EPA emails indicating that the study, which concludes that carbon dioxide is not a significant cause of climate change, was suppressed by the EPA for political reasons. You can read the comments that the CEI submitted to the EPA on EPA's proposed endangerment finding here, along with the emails. The censored report, by Alan Carlin and John Davidson, is here. In their report, Carlin and Davidson point out that the EPA has not done its own evaluation of the global warming theory. Rather, it has relied on analyses by others, mostly the U.N.'s IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) report. That report, however, was a political document, not a scientific one. Knowing that current scientific research disproves the anthropogenic global warming theory, the U.N. ordered that no recent research be considered in the IPCC report. This is a scandal of which too few people are aware. As science, the U.N. report is a bad joke. C) NASA has concluded that ALL the planets in our solar system are currently warming. D) Growing number of skeptics = hasty passage of "climate change" bill Steve Fielding recently asked the Obama administration to reassure him on the science of man-made global warming. When the administration proved unhelpful, Mr. Fielding decided to vote against climate-change legislation. If you haven't heard of this politician, it's because he's a member of the Australian Senate. As the U.S. House of Representatives prepares to pass a climate-change bill, the Australian Parliament is preparing to kill its own country's carbon-emissions scheme. Why? A growing number of Australian politicians, scientists and citizens once again doubt the science of human-caused global warming. Among the many reasons President Barack Obama and the Democratic majority are so intent on quickly jamming a cap-and-trade system through Congress is because the global warming tide is again shifting. It turns out Al Gore and the United Nations (with an assist from the media), did a little too vociferous a job smearing anyone who disagreed with them as "deniers." The backlash has brought the scientific debate roaring back to life in Australia, Europe, Japan and even, if less reported, the U.S.

Asked By: Welcome to Amerika Mr. 0rwell !! - 6/28/2009
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
Sorry...the Democrats were voted in and the majority of American voters kicked out the Republicans for a reason. This bill will be passed, along with health care and a number of other bills... More
Answered By: wooper - 6/28/2009
Additional Answers (15)
Of those 31,000 scientists, more than 10,000 are people with bachelor's degrees in engineering. Many of those engineers work in the oil and gas industries, and their paychecks come straight out of the profits of those companies. And nothing about being an engineer qualifies you to know anything at all about global... More
Answered By: Sadcat - 6/28/2009
These are all lobbyist organizations. Try again.
Answered By: Reality has a Liberal Bias - 6/28/2009
Answered By: Ford Prefect - 6/28/2009
I keep telling you, you can disagree all you want, the polar ice caps HAVE melted further than they should be, the water levels ARE rising, ocean temp IS increasing. THIS HAS ALREADY HAPPENED. How many times do I have to explain this to you? It's getting a little old.
Answered By: Chosen1 - 6/28/2009
Nope. A, B, and D are false. The 'study' and 'petition' are known fakes, where the 'project leaders' PAID people to sign their petition. The Guardian and others have repeatedly debunked this petition. I would need to study the others in detail to provide you with a valid opinion.
Answered By: bash - 6/28/2009
for the last time...........ITS NOT ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING!!!!! its about enslaving the american people, and making us all good little adolf obama bots.
Answered By: Brian - 6/28/2009
The president of the National Weather Service says global warming is not man made.
Answered By: Fakename - 6/28/2009
My man, you are using logic to argue with people who wear football helmets 24 hours a day and are only allowed spoons so as not to hurt themselves... More
Answered By: zipadedodazipadea - 6/28/2009
The Cap and Tax law will bring about a massive backlash against the Greens. In my local newspaper (which is just a run-of-the-mill newspaper), the legislation was described as raising energy costs (which is exactly what it will do). When nonideological people finally face the cost of the Green program, they will turn... More
Answered By: Brad - 6/28/2009
A very relevant study was published from Spain by Dr. Gabriel Calzada, an economics professor at Juan Carlos University in Madrid. The study concluded that every “green job” created in Spain resulted in 2.2 other jobs being destroyed... More
Answered By: why try ? - 6/28/2009
oh, I was opposed already... More
Answered By: Spock (rhp) - 6/28/2009
For "Sadcat" more than 9000 of the over 31,000 signers are Ph.D's. The left likes to claim that "the consensus of scientist" and "the majority of scientist" or "98 percent of scientist concur". Where that came from is a CNN story that listed the number at 3,146... More
Answered By: ohbrother - 6/28/2009
You don't really expect anyone who buys into the global warming, excuse me, climate change swindle to accept factual evidence, do you? That's like trying to convince an atheist that Jesus Christ exists. The only way an atheist will accept that Jesus Christ exists is to actually find out about Him and the same thing... More
Answered By: Jimbo - 6/28/2009
Vaclav Klaus (Czech president) has spoken against this too---he even used the phrase "Club of Rome" while talking on American TV about it! also there are other "Clubs" like in Budapest, and BTW everyone in the US only talks about the "CFR" but there is an ECFR too! also UNESCO is a player in all this. in the US... More
Answered By: Lorenzo the Itinerant - 6/28/2009
To the statist and the media, trying to prove to them that man made global warming doesn't exist would be likevtrying to prove to The Pope that God doesn't exist... More
Answered By: One Big A$s Mistake America - 6/29/2009
Sponsored results
Over 483 Local Jobs Now Hiring In Your Area. $18-$87/Hr - Apply Today!
Click. Search. Apply. Free!
Jobs hiring near your local area. Part-time, Full-time, Work at home.
Earn residual on products and services customers uses daily at home.

Other Career Questions

What is your current job? Why did you choose this job? What do you enjoy about your job? What do you dislike about your job? What would be your perfect job? Would you rather have this j...
3 answers - Asked By: drop pants not bombs!.♥ - 3/2/2010
Where are the jobs? Is productivity and globalization creating a permanent “recession” of jobs? My main issue is I am doing a paper for school and have no idea where to begin. I was hoping suggestions...
4 answers - Asked By: bayebd24【ツ】 - 11/21/2007
Hi ok im 19 and about to start college to do an acess course into a university. Ive been browsing through all the courses and im tottaly stuck! I thought politics but im scared ill end up with some r...
1 answers - Asked By: roseparkerly - 1/26/2009

Content is not owned or controlled by Monster. Any content concerns should be addressed with Yahoo!
Yahoo! Does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. Yahoo! Disclaimer.

Popular Articles

Best-Paying Work-from-Home Jobs Article Rating
It’s easier than ever to work from home. Of course, not every job is a mobile job, and some companies aren’t interested in having their employees work from home.
2013 Marketing Jobs Outlook Article Rating
The US may be facing another year of anemic hiring overall, but that won't be the case in the high-orbit world of multichannel, digital media marketing.
For Employers: Post Jobs | Search Resumes | Advertise
About Monster | Work for Monster | Advertise with Us | AdChoices | Partner with Us | Investor Relations | Social Media
Terms of Use | Privacy Center | Accessibility Center | Help | Security | Contact Us | Sitemap | Mobile
©2014 Monster - All Rights Reserved U.S. Patents No. 5,832,497; 7,599,930 B1; 7,827,125 and 7,836,060 MWW - Looking for Monster Cable? - V: 2014.1.40.24-206