i need to give this speech in four minutes, would u say it is halfway decent?

It is for a debate, and i am assigned to be against the resolution that states The UN should impose economic sanctions, and if necessary use military force to halt Iran's nuclear program. Hello, my name is John Greenwood and I am the Second Negative Constructive Speaker. Since the United States dropped the infamous atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the closing months of World War II, nuclear weapons have been a worrisome topic. In recent years, Iran has started its controversial nuclear program. Many believe that the purpose of Irans nuclear program is to obtain nuclear weapons, capable of mass destruction, while Iran claims the sole purpose of its program is for civilian power. Affirmative arguments include Iran’s alleged financial ties with terrorist organizations. The idea of Iran selling a nuclear bomb to a terror group is illogical because of the extreme costs of the many years of building and research. A terrorist group most likely could never afford a weapon that cost over a billion USD to research and build. Another affirmative argument is that Iran has test fired long range missiles in recent years. While Iran has these missiles, Israel has nuclear weapons and missiles of far more advanced technology than Iran, and the negative side believes it would only seem right to build up a defense, since Israel has a history of attacking countries. (00:45) (s1 minute) For a resolution including economic sanctions to be passed in the United Nations Security Council, not one of the five permanent members can vote against it. The five permanent countries include the United States, the United Kingdom, Russia, China, and France. Both Russia and China are regular traders with Iran, and China has built a strong economic alliance with Iran, with many Chinese companies having facilities in Iran. China has also helped Iran with building dams, shipyards, ports, airports, mine-development, and oil and gas infrastructure. Iran exports an average of 408,000 barrels a day, valued at $15.8 billion USD. If economic sanctions were passed, it would not only do the intended job of damaging Iran’s economy, but would indirectly damage China and Russia’s economies. Eventually economic sanctions would affect many other countries, including the UK, France, and United States, because they would not be able to import fuel from Iran, subsequently causing gas prices to rise. In the past few weeks Iran has also stated that if the UN imposed any more economic sanctions, Iran would not follow through with its agreement with Brazil and Turkey. Under this agreement, Iran is to send enriched Uranium to Brazil and Turkey in return for fuel rods which will be used for a reactor which makes medical isotopes for cancer treatment. Since the Islamic revolution Iran has had a fairly stable government that could protect and handle nuclear weapons. They have established a theocratic republic government, and have been able to vote for their leaders. Iran’s government operates somewhat similarly to the United States government’s idea of checks and balances. The negative side also believes that if the United Nations used military force to halt Iran’s nuclear program, most likely it would be ineffective and expensive, which the United States might not be able to afford as it has already put about $1.05 trillion towards the Iraq and Afghanistan wars since 2001. As previously discussed, economic sanctions would affect Russia and China, as well as cause a worldwide rise in gas prices. The negative side concludes that the resolution would not be effective, as it would not be passed if it included economic sanctions that could damage Russia and China’s economies, and that military action is ineffective and expensive. The negative side believes that a different resolution be thought of, or that Iran should be allowed to follow through with its nuclear program if it is strictly for power and is closely watched by the United Nations. i am supposed to be on the side for allowing them to follow through with their nuclear program, or at least not use economic sanctions/military

Asked By: John - 5/25/2010
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
The united states government's idea is the problem, the issue is not iran's government
Answered By: Ismael - 5/25/2010
Additional Answers (1)
bias much? Iran must not be allowed to obtain nukes. Ahmadinajad is a nutcase that has said he wants to wipe Israel and the USA off the map.
Answered By: Tea Bagger - 5/26/2010
Sponsored results
Over 483 Local Jobs Now Hiring In Your Area. $18-$87/Hr - Apply Today!
Work At Home Jobs Make $87/HR, Jobs Seen On TV. Jobs Hiring Now
Drive Your Car - Make up to $600 Per Weekend. Work When You Want.
Up to $47/hr Part-Time Job Openings. Free Schedule, No Scam. Start Now

Other Career Questions

What is your current job? Why did you choose this job? What do you enjoy about your job? What do you dislike about your job? What would be your perfect job? Would you rather have this j...
3 answers - Asked By: drop pants not bombs!.♥ - 3/2/2010
Where are the jobs? Is productivity and globalization creating a permanent “recession” of jobs? My main issue is I am doing a paper for school and have no idea where to begin. I was hoping suggestions...
4 answers - Asked By: bayebd24【ツ】 - 11/21/2007
Hi ok im 19 and about to start college to do an acess course into a university. Ive been browsing through all the courses and im tottaly stuck! I thought politics but im scared ill end up with some r...
1 answers - Asked By: roseparkerly - 1/26/2009

Content is not owned or controlled by Monster. Any content concerns should be addressed with Yahoo!
Yahoo! Does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. Yahoo! Disclaimer.

Popular Articles

Best-Paying Work-from-Home Jobs Article Rating
It’s easier than ever to work from home. Of course, not every job is a mobile job, and some companies aren’t interested in having their employees work from home.
2013 Marketing Jobs Outlook Article Rating
The US may be facing another year of anemic hiring overall, but that won't be the case in the high-orbit world of multichannel, digital media marketing.
For Employers: Post Jobs | Search Resumes | Advertise
About Monster | Work for Monster | Advertise with Us | AdChoices | Partner with Us | Investor Relations | Social Media
Terms of Use | Privacy Center | Accessibility Center | Help | Security | Contact Us | Sitemap | Mobile
©2014 Monster - All Rights Reserved U.S. Patents No. 5,832,497; 7,599,930 B1; 7,827,125 and 7,836,060 MWW - Looking for Monster Cable? - V: 2014.1.40.24-309