Shouldn't people who want to be called 'skeptics' be, you know, skeptical about something?

Everyone's favorite blog Wattsupwiththat has reposted an article by Christopher Horner at the ultra right-wing news site Pajamas Media. The story is about Spain’s Dr. Gabriel Calzada, who co-authored an exceptionally faulty (unpublished) study which wrongfully concluded that Spain's 'green' spending was causing job loss, but which nonetheless generated a lot of headlines due to the controversial conclusion. Calzada claimed that he received a package with a return address from a solar energy company. He claims to have called them up, and they told him it was "their answer to my energy pieces." Apparently being either exceptionally paraonid and/or perceiving this as a death threat - from a solar energy company - Calzada claims to have contacted a terrorism expert, who scanned the box and opened it, revealing a dismantled bomb. Supposedly this was a warning - the next one would explode. Now reading this story, your bullsh!t detector might go off. Why would anybody put their return address on a package containing a dismantled bomb? Why would Calzada immediately be so concerned as to contact a "terrorism expert"? Why would the terrorism expert even bother to investigate this package from a solar power company? And why was this story completely ignored by everyone except the right-wing media and denier blogs? Not surprisingly, this story turned out to be a complete fraud. But that didn't stop the supposed 'skeptics' at Watts' blog from not only posting it, but from buying the clearly bogus story without question. Here are some of the first blog comments: "There is really no other way to look at the situation. The AGW industry has become an organized crime syndicate." "And then they wonder why scientist not swallowing the AGW scam are not coming out in the light… those are still dangerous times to speak out, it seams." "Blacklists,bombthreats,these are acts of terror and not a peep from MSM !!" Not until the tenth comment does a single 'skeptic' exhibit any sort of skepticism about this utterly transparent story. Shouldn't people who want to be called 'skeptics' be, you know, skeptical about something? Oh and by the way, the story was published a week ago, and has been neither corrected nor retracted from Watts' blog. Oh and a further embarrassment for Watts - Steve Goddard posted an article claiming Arctic sea ice was increasing. This one however was caught and corrected, and left up "as an example of what not to do when graphing trends." That's a caveat that should be used for every single one of Goddard's posts. And of course let's not forget the Beeville science fair story. Thanks DaveH. Apparently the editors of Pajamas Media are more honest than Anthony Watts. How said is that? I think bravozulu just jumped the shark. w*f is that guy smoking? Some crazy genes in that family.

Asked By: Dana1981 - 7/3/2010
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
Would that be the same Chris Horner from the Competitive Enterprise Institute (funded by Exxon and the American Petroleum Institute), the Heartland Institute (funded by Exxon and other oil companies), Frontiers of Freedom (funded by Exxon), the National Center for Policy Analysis (funded by Exxon), the Tech Center (... More
Answered By: Trevor - 7/3/2010
Additional Answers (9)
"Oh and a further embarrassment for Watts" huh? you mean he thinks there's something to be ashamed of... More
Answered By: linlyons - 7/3/2010
This story has been updated at its source.
Answered By: DaveH - 7/3/2010
I am certainly skeptical that the story is a complete fabrication. Wattsupwiththat has many times the readership of the highest propaganda site from the left, realclimate or is it realleftistpropaganda, I sometimes get confused. I recall reading that story. It had the ring of truth where people were being threatened... More
Answered By: bravozulu - 7/3/2010
I am a bit sceptical about what you are trying to say
Answered By: isee clearly - 7/3/2010
That's pretty funny - I would have thought such a story would have been taken with a hint more of incredulity. You're right about the return address and the "professionals" - really, a simple bit of research would have saved them so much embarrassment, esp. taking into account the fact that they're posting these... More
Answered By: A Modest Proposal - 7/3/2010
"That's the problem with skeptics nowadays, seems they'll believe anything" Can't remember who said it, but it applies wonderfully well to most global warming 'skeptics'.
Answered By: MTRstudent - 7/4/2010
it's called second-order confirmation bias... More
Answered By: Paul B - 7/4/2010
Your right. Since AGW doesn't exist I guess you can't be skeptical about it..
Answered By: George Orwell - 7/4/2010
About the only thing you get from Trevor is Exxon is funding it. The lack of critical thinking from you and Trevor is pretty revealing about who you are and what you are. You are a leftist and nothing more. You pretend that your leftist ramblings amount to science. They don't. They simply amount to paranoid leftist... More
Answered By: jim z - 7/4/2010
Sponsored results
Over 483 Local Jobs Now Hiring In Your Area. $18-$87/Hr - Apply Today!
Looking for inspiring work? Innovation lives here.
Click. Search. Apply. Free!
Jobs hiring near your local area. Part-time, Full-time, Work at home.

Other Career Questions

What is your current job? Why did you choose this job? What do you enjoy about your job? What do you dislike about your job? What would be your perfect job? Would you rather have this j...
3 answers - Asked By: drop pants not bombs!.♥ - 3/2/2010
Where are the jobs? Is productivity and globalization creating a permanent “recession” of jobs? My main issue is I am doing a paper for school and have no idea where to begin. I was hoping suggestions...
4 answers - Asked By: bayebd24【ツ】 - 11/21/2007
Hi ok im 19 and about to start college to do an acess course into a university. Ive been browsing through all the courses and im tottaly stuck! I thought politics but im scared ill end up with some r...
1 answers - Asked By: roseparkerly - 1/26/2009

Content is not owned or controlled by Monster. Any content concerns should be addressed with Yahoo!
Yahoo! Does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. Yahoo! Disclaimer.

Popular Articles

Best-Paying Work-from-Home Jobs Article Rating
It’s easier than ever to work from home. Of course, not every job is a mobile job, and some companies aren’t interested in having their employees work from home.
2013 Marketing Jobs Outlook Article Rating
The US may be facing another year of anemic hiring overall, but that won't be the case in the high-orbit world of multichannel, digital media marketing.
For Employers: Post Jobs | Search Resumes | Advertise
About Monster | Work for Monster | Advertise with Us | AdChoices | Partner with Us | Investor Relations | Social Media
Terms of Use | Privacy Center | Accessibility Center | Help | Security | Contact Us | Sitemap | Mobile
©2014 Monster - All Rights Reserved U.S. Patents No. 5,832,497; 7,599,930 B1; 7,827,125 and 7,836,060 MWW - Looking for Monster Cable? - V: 2014.1.40.24-220