Why are poor Americans so quick to defend the rich?

This is a phenomenon that is probably unique to the U.S.: very poor people, generally conservative, are very quick to defend the very rich, whenever a new tax is proposed. For example, "Tea Party" Republicans- most of whom are middle class- rejected any possibility of a tax on millionaires and billionaires. In any other society, it would be the poor and "not so rich" who would be the first to demand that the rich pay their fair share. But in the U.S., somehow, oddly, the poor rush to the defense of the very people who more often than not have affected THEM in a negative way. Here are some "highlights" of the ways the very rich have been treating their greatest "supporters." -Exporting millions of jobs over a decade or more to China, India and other nations. The "exported" jobs were very often high-pay, skill requiring jobs. Ohio and Michigan: send a thank you to your billionaire corporate overlords. -In the financial sector, billionaires helped spur the housing bubble and inevitable crash, by taking mortgages and creating "securities" out of them, and then repackaging those, ad infinitum. Standard and Poors called these 'AAA' rated securities. Thank you S&P and banks. -The insurance companies and healthcare affiliated companies fought tooth and nail to prevent the passage of any healthcare act. It also helped "craft" Bush's "prescription drug plan," which most economists call "corporate welfare" for the drug companies. Thank you healthcare billionaires! -While the middle class has no benefit of off-shore and Swiss tax havens, corporate millionaires and billionaires pay next to nothing in taxes because of these. Proportionately, a billionaire pays less than the poor African American single mother working at the local Mickey Dees. God bless you corporate patriots! Meanwhile, the bulk of the dead in Afghanistan and Iraq come from middle to lower class families. They lose and arm and a leg, while the corporate overlords charge the rest of us an arm and a leg. Patriots all! -While the incomes of most lower and middle class Americans have stagnated, not just during the recent crisis, but since the "Reagan Era," corporate salaries have skyrocketed. In a single large company, the salary of a lowly employee can be as little as $20,000, while the salary of the CEO and top Board can range in the tens, maybe hundreds, of millions of dollars. Corporate America, you have done it again! This is just the tip of the iceberg. Yet, inexplicably, Joe and Jane "Podunk" Smith, are devout Tea Partiers, they will not stand for one penny more paid by our corporate "tax welfare queens." Do Tea Party People smoke something? What the h-ll is wrong with these fools? Some additional information for the "uninformed." -Trickle down economics, whicn a few of you answering have alluded to, is perhaps the oldest canard in the box of tricks that the wealthy conervatives use. It failed in the U.S. and Britain during the 1980s. The idea was that if you reduce taxes, the rich will have more, and they will invest and spend more, and everyone wins. The greatest proponent of this idea was Arthur Laffer, who can frequently be seen and heard on Fox News. Mr. Laffer's theory has been widely rejected by the academic community. The opposite is actually true: you reduce taxes on the corporate millionaires, and you, of course, have less revenue. It may be true that a healthy economy results in more revenues, but there is actually a much stronger positive connection between government spending and a healthy economy. The "Laffer Curve" sounded great in practice but has always failed to live up to its promise. -Most spending by the rich is actually not as useful econo -mically as spending by the poor. The reason is that the poor will almost inevitably spend it all on necessities- which are pumped back into the economy. Meanwhile, once a billionaire has obtained all of the necessities he requires, he invests the rest. Much of that money is invested overseas, not here at home. Thus, while poor people spend nearly all of their money at home, thus fueling the domestic economy, the rich spend it in a mix of places, but certainly nowhere near as much as here at home. Sure, some invest in business at home, but the vast numbers of corporate millionaires and billionaires invest it in overseas tax shelters. This is probably the second greatest canard conservatives use to justify not taxing these fat cats. Get your information right people before you drink the corporate welfare Kool Aid. Some information on debt to GDP: While it is true that the debt is now a greater proportion of the GDP, and certainly spending is much to blame, lower taxes are also to blame. Since the 1980s, corporate taxes, and taxes on the very rich, have steeply declined. As a result, the U.S. government now BORROWS more to pay off the budget, and this, in turn, fuels higher interest rate payments on the debt. It is actually lower taxes, not higher taxes, that have largely led to a higher debt/GDP ratio. My take on the Tea Party: I think the good intentions are there, but there is an overwhelming lack of true understanding of economic an dpolitical fundamentals. Economically, the fact is, you do not cut spending during a recession to spur growth. That just does not work. Sure, austerity measures make ratings agencies and bond holders happy, but that does not create jobs or spur the economy. The Tea Party people, by and large, have a very homespun, limited understanding of economics. They feel that the U.S. government is like a family on a budget; all you need do is balance your budget and all is well. That is not how macroeconomic policy works. Politically, the Tea Party people are largely incalcitrant and unwilling to compromise. They are extremists in this sense. They feel they are so "right" that there is no need to compromise. Little wonder why so many of them tend to be social conservatives, who also exhibit this stubborn lack of willingness to compromise. But politics does not this way. Politics is about compromise.

Asked By: Alan H - 8/9/2011
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
Eric Cantor and John Boehner have agreed to raise taxes on the rich, if there are equal or greater tax cuts elsewhere. Why in the world do you think that more taxes is going to help matters... More
Answered By: thomas f - 8/9/2011
Additional Answers (14)
They are catching on and they are about to change their minds.
Answered By: Glass Cup - 8/9/2011
You sir... know what your talking about.
Answered By: Turnip Fanta - 8/9/2011
Hello , Whe the rich do not spend ,, the poor lose jobs .
Answered By: seven_up_the_uncola - 8/9/2011
Because the poor people pay the highest price when the rich are taxed more. Unemployment, higher prices, and less opportunity.
Answered By: Phoenix - 8/9/2011
All Rich people are not bad, just like All Black People are not bad, Stop generalizing
Answered By: Clam Dancing - 8/9/2011
God Alan.... on top of being a loser.... you are a long winded one! LOL... More
Answered By: Stephen M - 8/9/2011
what's equal isn't always fair. what's fair isn't always equal.
Answered By: Brendan - 8/9/2011
Because they know who starts businesses and creates jobs. It ain't the government.
Answered By: thegubmint - 8/9/2011
I don't support or the defend the rich. I defend the rights of people to have the ability to achieve whatever they aspire to without being victimized by a useless class warfare mentality. Want to talk about reforming the tax structure so that everyone pays their fair share without loopholes to hide behind? I am all for... More
Answered By: Bryan - 8/9/2011
The republican parties image by poorer especially white Americans in red states is different then the wealthy republicans perspective. Poor white republicans vote more on tradition and less on the issues at hand. Perhaps because they tend to live a more simple life. It is hard to get them to vote democrat because... More
Answered By: Johnny Mac - 8/9/2011
Demand creates jobs. The rich don't.
Answered By: Kelly Jones NDP - 8/9/2011
You started out by identifying some of the problems that the US economy faces and slowly degraded into scapegoating just large multinational corporations and ended with an insulting tirade on the Tea Party... More
Answered By: Their Constitution rules them - 8/9/2011
basically the rich represent the American Dream. You support the rich, you're buying a lottery ticket to join them... More
Answered By: nicoatridge - 8/12/2011
Well this gov has been a complete distaster. Not one thing has actually improved since taking over, not 1. Unemployment is not only 9%, but there is no sign that anyone has any idea what to even do about it, and this is the longest in history that unemployment has been like this without seeing some improvement.
Answered By: SDeck - 8/12/2011
Sponsored results
Over 483 Local Jobs Now Hiring In Your Area. $18-$87/Hr - Apply Today!
Work At Home Jobs Make $87/HR, Jobs Seen On TV. Jobs Hiring Now
Up to $47/hr Part-Time Job Openings. Free Schedule, No Scam. Start Now
Learn More About the Internet Lifestyle Network and Internet Jobs

Other Career Questions

What is your current job? Why did you choose this job? What do you enjoy about your job? What do you dislike about your job? What would be your perfect job? Would you rather have this j...
3 answers - Asked By: drop pants not bombs!.♥ - 3/2/2010
Where are the jobs? Is productivity and globalization creating a permanent “recession” of jobs? My main issue is I am doing a paper for school and have no idea where to begin. I was hoping suggestions...
4 answers - Asked By: bayebd24【ツ】 - 11/21/2007
Hi ok im 19 and about to start college to do an acess course into a university. Ive been browsing through all the courses and im tottaly stuck! I thought politics but im scared ill end up with some r...
1 answers - Asked By: roseparkerly - 1/26/2009

Content is not owned or controlled by Monster. Any content concerns should be addressed with Yahoo!
Yahoo! Does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. Yahoo! Disclaimer.

Popular Articles

Best-Paying Work-from-Home Jobs Article Rating
It’s easier than ever to work from home. Of course, not every job is a mobile job, and some companies aren’t interested in having their employees work from home.
2013 Marketing Jobs Outlook Article Rating
The US may be facing another year of anemic hiring overall, but that won't be the case in the high-orbit world of multichannel, digital media marketing.
For Employers: Post Jobs | Search Resumes | Advertise
About Monster | Work for Monster | Advertise with Us | AdChoices | Partner with Us | Investor Relations | Social Media
Terms of Use | Privacy Center | Accessibility Center | Help | Security | Contact Us | Sitemap | Mobile
©2014 Monster - All Rights Reserved U.S. Patents No. 5,832,497; 7,599,930 B1; 7,827,125 and 7,836,060 MWW - Looking for Monster Cable? - V: 2014.1.40.24-221