Why is WWE not including Ole Anderson in The Indiction of The Four Horsemen?

WWE is inducting The 1988 Version of The Four Horsemen: the Nature Boy Ric Flair, Tully Blanchard, Arn Anderson, Barry Windham and James J. Dillon, why are they skipping the 1986 version: Ole Anderson, Arn Anderson, Tully Blanchard, The Nature Boy Ric Flair and James J. Dillon?

Asked By: "Jim Crockett Promotions Fan" - 1/10/2012
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
Ole hates Vince McMahon and spent a considerable amount of time trying to bury Vince in the press... More
Answered By: The Dragon - 1/10/2012
Additional Answers (8)
No idea why. Ole Anderson was a big part of the 4 horsemen.
Answered By: Jeff Hardy мαιи єνєит мαfια - 1/10/2012
Why would they do that when Ric Flair is signed to TNA? He wouldn't be able to make it to the Hall Of Fame then. Which would be a shame in my opinion. You can't induct the 4-Horsemen without The Nature Boy.(and I have no idea who Ole Anderson is)
Answered By: EWE Chairman, Joey(S.E.S) - 1/10/2012
2 reasons come to mind. 1.Vince,Flair and Ole still have bad blood between them. 2.Ole wants nothing to do with WWE.
Answered By: cнιcαɢo ĸɴιɢнт - 1/10/2012
You mean Induction and not Indiction right? They are totally different things.
Answered By: ♣The Devil's Favorite Demon♥ - 1/10/2012
I guess Vince still hates Ole Anderson and he just skipped him, went with Barry Windham instead and acted like Ole never existed in what was arguably the biggest part of his career.
Answered By: Pook S - 1/10/2012
When I think of the Four Horsemen, it's Flair, Double A, Tully, and Ole with JJ as manager. Windham was a poor substitute for Ole Anderson, who should indeed be included in the HOF induction.
Answered By: David - 1/10/2012
True. They should.
Answered By: Rajpath - 1/10/2012
- Jim Ross wrote the following this afternoon in regards to Horseman Ole Anderson not being inducted with the others and Ric Flair appearing: "Don't know status of Ole Anderson re: WWE HOF. Knowing Ole, he likely could care less. Will Flair be @ ceremony? Wouldn't surprise me. TBD."
Answered By: loki - 1/10/2012
Sponsored results
Over 483 Local Jobs Now Hiring In Your Area. $18-$87/Hr - Apply Today!
Click. Search. Apply. Free!
Jobs hiring near your local area. Part-time, Full-time, Work at home.
Sobre 287 Trabajos en tu area. $15-87/hora - Aplica Ahora.

Other Career Questions

What is your current job? Why did you choose this job? What do you enjoy about your job? What do you dislike about your job? What would be your perfect job? Would you rather have this j...
3 answers - Asked By: drop pants not bombs!.♥ - 3/2/2010
Where are the jobs? Is productivity and globalization creating a permanent “recession” of jobs? My main issue is I am doing a paper for school and have no idea where to begin. I was hoping suggestions...
4 answers - Asked By: bayebd24【ツ】 - 11/21/2007
Hi ok im 19 and about to start college to do an acess course into a university. Ive been browsing through all the courses and im tottaly stuck! I thought politics but im scared ill end up with some r...
1 answers - Asked By: roseparkerly - 1/26/2009

Content is not owned or controlled by Monster. Any content concerns should be addressed with Yahoo!
Yahoo! Does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. Yahoo! Disclaimer.

Popular Articles

Best-Paying Work-from-Home Jobs Article Rating
It’s easier than ever to work from home. Of course, not every job is a mobile job, and some companies aren’t interested in having their employees work from home.
2013 Marketing Jobs Outlook Article Rating
The US may be facing another year of anemic hiring overall, but that won't be the case in the high-orbit world of multichannel, digital media marketing.
For Employers: Post Jobs | Search Resumes | Advertise
About Monster | Work for Monster | Advertise with Us | AdChoices | Partner with Us | Investor Relations | Social Media
Terms of Use | Privacy Center | Accessibility Center | Help | Security | Contact Us | Sitemap | Mobile
©2014 Monster - All Rights Reserved U.S. Patents No. 5,832,497; 7,599,930 B1; 7,827,125 and 7,836,060 MWW - Looking for Monster Cable? - V: 2014.1.40.24-310