Is the unemployment rate relevant/acceptable? Artsy libs & fans of colors & lights should love this pretty map?

Since what a President's done over three-plus years in Office has traditionally determined whether he’s reelected, the following linked graphic display provides a great visual representation of how the country has fared under Obama. Are record high unemployment, poverty levels, food stamp participation, a struggling economy, and unprecedented drop in the workforce participation rate on the minds of at least some voters this election? Progressives and supporters of this Administration are sure to love all the pretty colors and lights that are awesome on a map that promises to light up in a very different way this fall. Do you like the bright, light colors, or the handsome transformation to different hues? If you’re looking for BLS information updated through February, the following question might be of interest:;_ylt=AuIoTMN8wu6vXiWltXulziXsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20120305162332AA92SBX Does the economy and employment picture still have an impact on your vote and the political mindset of those closest to you? Are we really going to let the media and liberal strategists couch the upcoming election as first and foremost about contraceptive and women's reproductive rights? Many of us believe jobs and the economy are what the election must be about. But if you're simply a fan of pretty colors and lights, please consider the map and deepening color shift an early St. Patrick's Day display, since we're well past Christmas now. Is employment and the current U.S. economy relevant to this election, or has the left fully sold its deception one more time to shift the political discourse? If you’d prefer a light hearted view, Steve Bridges is ready to provide that for you.

Asked By: Rocky Mountain Patriot - 3/8/2012
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
Yep. That's an impressive lights display! Of course, if anyone stops to think about the meaning behind the transformation, it should make any honest American want to throw up... More
Answered By: Nature Girl - 3/8/2012
Additional Answers (11)
ROCKY- Most people would have done worse given the circumstances. But the numbers are going down. Thank goodness. Its acceptable to me.
Answered By: Zodiac Man II - 3/8/2012
Yep, the Republican leadership said they would wreck the country rather than allow the President to lead. Looks like they are doing a good job of it.
Answered By: Nostrils - 3/8/2012
It isn't acceptable but it's moving in the right direction. Being from Colorado, I'm very happy with several initiatives that have helped our local economy that come directly from this administration. Solar, as I'm sure you know, is HUGE in the south now, the Denver Metro area is enjoying a nice tech/defense boom and... More
Answered By: Delt No.2 - 3/8/2012
Do conservatives suffer from amnesia? Are the Great Recession and the economic meltdown of 2008 strange concepts that you've never heard of before... More
Answered By: tribeca_belle - 3/8/2012
Elections are contests between candidates. Why would we think the economy will do any better under any of the Republican candidates. At the end of the last Republican administration the Dow was at 8,000 and the banks were about fail.
Answered By: Paul Jackson - 3/8/2012
Wow! Thanks for the links... More
Answered By: Josh H♥OTx - 3/8/2012
Great Bridges link... More
Answered By: who is #1? - 3/8/2012
The problem is, it's not clear that if McCain were elected instead of Obama that the economy would have been any better. Remember, the bad economy was an issue during the McCain-Obama election as well. So, I would say the reason the bad economy isn't as much of an issue now as it was 4 years ago is that it's not... More
Answered By: Brian D - 3/8/2012
Do you think any liberal/democrat noticed that the map changed or was it just ohhh, pretty? Thank for the Steve Bridges bit!!
Answered By: Sophie's daddy - 3/8/2012
I know that in 2004, when George W. Bush had us cooking along with an unemployment rate of 4.6% we were said to have "Full Employment" because they admitted that folks with home based businesses were counted as unemployed. Now, in order to be counted in the Obamaconomy, one must be actively looking, and Iit is obvious... More
Answered By: Billy Bob - 3/8/2012
The US is not under employed, they are behind the times... More
Answered By: MTR 2.0 - 3/10/2012
Sponsored results
Work At Home Jobs Make $87/HR, Jobs Seen On TV. Jobs Hiring Now
Legitimate Surveys for Cash.Extra Money for You,Join Here!
Over 465 Local Jobs Now Hiring In Your Area. $15-$80/Hr - Apply Today!
Over 482 Local Jobs Now Hiring In Your Area. $19-$87/Hr - Apply Today!

Other Career Questions

What is your current job? Why did you choose this job? What do you enjoy about your job? What do you dislike about your job? What would be your perfect job? Would you rather have this j...
3 answers - Asked By: drop pants not bombs!.♥ - 3/2/2010
Where are the jobs? Is productivity and globalization creating a permanent “recession” of jobs? My main issue is I am doing a paper for school and have no idea where to begin. I was hoping suggestions...
4 answers - Asked By: bayebd24【ツ】 - 11/21/2007
Hi ok im 19 and about to start college to do an acess course into a university. Ive been browsing through all the courses and im tottaly stuck! I thought politics but im scared ill end up with some r...
1 answers - Asked By: roseparkerly - 1/26/2009

Content is not owned or controlled by Monster. Any content concerns should be addressed with Yahoo!
Yahoo! Does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. Yahoo! Disclaimer.

Popular Articles

Best-Paying Work-from-Home Jobs Article Rating
It’s easier than ever to work from home. Of course, not every job is a mobile job, and some companies aren’t interested in having their employees work from home.
2013 Marketing Jobs Outlook Article Rating
The US may be facing another year of anemic hiring overall, but that won't be the case in the high-orbit world of multichannel, digital media marketing.
For Employers: Post Jobs | Search Resumes | Advertise
About Monster | Work for Monster | Advertise with Us | AdChoices | Partner with Us | Investor Relations | Social Media
Terms of Use | Privacy Center | Accessibility Center | Help | Security | Contact Us | Sitemap | Mobile
©2014 Monster - All Rights Reserved U.S. Patents No. 5,832,497; 7,599,930 B1; 7,827,125 and 7,836,060 MWW - Looking for Monster Cable? - V: 2014.1.40.24-211