Share

Can the Jahavah's Wintness bible called the NWT be trusted?

Were the Wehovah's Jitnesses behind that scholars in Greek and Hebrew or is their text riddled with mistakes and not recognised by serious language scholars as a decent translation? Were the men tasked with the translation by the Jehovah's Witnesses up to the job or unable to spell and translate? Could they be trusted to string two words together?

Asked By: Hamish - 9/20/2012
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
You might think it biased if I as one of JW's said that the NWT is one of the best, so why not listen to what some of the worlds leading translators and Greek sholars say:

In fact, the New World Translation is a scholarly work., Professor Benjamin Kedar of Israel said:

Jason BeDuhn associate professor of religious studies in his book compares nine translations including the KJ, "the New World Translation “is one of the most accurate English translations of the New Testament currently available”

Rolf Furuli: "I read the English text of the NWT against the Hebrew text, word for word...the translators of the NWT have been extremely faithful both to their own translation principles and to the Hebrew text."
-Lecturer in Semitic Languages at Oslo University

Steven T. Byington: Of the NWT, "If you are digging for excellent or suggestive renderings, this is among the richer mines."
-Christian Century, "Review of the New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures"

Frederick Danker: "Not to be snubbed is the New World Translation of the Hebrew Scriptures, Rendered from the Original by the New World Bible Translation Committee."
-"Multipurpose Tools for Bible Study"

Edgar Goodspeed: "I am...much pleased with the free, frank, and vigorous translation. It exhibits a vast array of sound serious learning, as I can testify."- professor of Greek at the University of Chicago.

C. Houtman: "The New World Translation of the Jehovah's Witnesses can survive the scrutiny of criticism."
-"Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift", [Dutch Theological Magazines]

Benjamin Kedar: "I find my feeling repeatedly confirmed that [the OT] reflects an honest endeavor to achieve an understanding of the text that is as accurate as possible....Giving evidence of a broad command of the original language...I have never discovered in the New World Translation any biased intent to read something into the text that it does not contain."
-Professor of Jewish, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Dr. Bruce Metzger: "On the whole, one gains a tolerably good impression of the scholarly equipment of the translators."
-Professor at Princeton Theological Seminary and Scholar in Greek, OT Studies and NT Studies in "The Bible Translator"

J. D Phillips: "Last week I purchased a copy of your New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures of which I take pride in being an owner. You have done a marvelous work...but you have made a marvelous step in the right direction, and I pray God that your Version will be used to His glory. What you have done for the Name alone is worth all the effort and cost!"

Charles Francis Potter: In "the New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures...the anonymous translators have certainly rendered the best manuscript texts...with scholarly ability and acumen."
-The Faith Men Live By

William Carey Taylor: The NT of the NWT contains "considerable scholarship."
-"The New Bible Pro and Con"

Allen Wikgren: It is "independent reading of merit."
-Scholar on the NRSV committee, as well as on the committee which produced the UBS Greek text

Thomas N. Winter: "The translation by the anonymous committee is thoroughly up to date and consistently accurate...In sum, when a witness comes to the door, the classicist, Greek student, or Bible student alike would do well to place an order."
-Professor of Koine Greek at the University of Nebraska

Here is a link to an independent accuracy chart that compares bibles with the "criticle text":
http://web.archive.org/web/20040602211507/http://hector3000.future.easyspace.com/colwell.htm

EDIT @Babel.......Most of your quotes came from the same person "Julius Mantey " who is just showing his own religious presuppositions, he is biased against the NWT ,and has his own agenda, as was "William Barclay" who was a trinitarian.....!!!!

The quotes I gave were not by scholars and translators that have an agenda but are from respected professors of Greek and translators that are NON BIASED!

As for the quote from Bruce M. Metzger it looks like you got your quote from anti JW sites and dubious sites, Bruce M. Metzger did not say that, for a reliable quote see what he says at wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Translation_of_the_Holy_Scriptures

Shows how much you know as the translators are anonymous and the ones you quoted were not translators, if the translators knew nothing of Greek then why would some of the top translator say what they did above? Tell me that? You can't deny the TRUTH !!!
Here is the "accuracy chart again:
http://web.archive.org/web/20040602211507/http://hector3000.future.easyspace.com/colwell.htm
Answered By: Terry - 9/20/2012
Additional Answers ()
I think the testimony of respected scholars & critics given by many answerers already, as well those unbiased, speaks for itself. Out of the hundreds of different translations of the Bible, it's really silly why the NWT specifically is attacked as much as it is, while other hundreds of translations, even those much newer, are not called into question. And with silly unfounded reasons given like 'why did a new translation need to be made, it HAD to be an impure motive'.... well, if that was a valid argument would it not then naturally be assumed the same regarding ALL the other hundreds of translations as well, ESPECIALLY the newer ones- 'why were those made, HAD to be an impure motive'? Of course not, which clearly shows the unfounded prejudice, bias, & emptiness of that ridiculous accusation. The motives of the translation were- 1)easier to read verbage, 2)ensure more complete accuracy as translated from the original languages to ensure there was NO religious bias inserted, but purity from the original writings only. Quite honestly, the most honorable intentions there could be.

As another answerer said, JW's also very comfortably use whatever translation is available or that a person is comfortable with. Most JW's have multiple different translations in their personal home libraries. And the NWT is still not available in every language so many JW's in other lands still use other translations exclusively. The point is, regardless of the translation used, the overall teachings of the Bible are the same. That is the point right? Correct Bible teachings? After all that would be the only PURE motive of a critic, correct? To ensure that precious true Bible teachings remain intact? If so, you will study & compare for yourself so that you can make a knowledgeable decision based on real research, not one based on empty accusations & such school-yard-type pass-it-on gossip.
Answered By: eliziam - 9/21/2012
At that time those in fear of Jehovah spoke with one another, each one with his companion, and Jehovah kept paying attention and listening. And a book of remembrance began to be written up before him for those in fear of Jehovah and for those thinking upon his name. Malachi 3:16

Agape Love to all My Brothers and Sisters.
Answered By: Paradise - 9/21/2012
Hi Hamish, I am not too sure if you are being sincere because this has raised a real personal question that you are being frank about or could be just re-iterating already debunked notions that tickle you and feel you want to re-broadcast them for your mischievous pleasure.

Jehovah's Witnesses can teach truths from any Bible. People who take up having home Bible studies do and use their own preferred Bible of choice. It doesn't prevent us from teaching about who Jehovah is. Who Christ Jesus is. Or what the kingdom of God will do for all humanity on earth. I don't believe there is such as thing literally as a bad Bible.

The New World Translation has stood up to scrutiny - true just as with any translation that exists you cannot please everyone all of the time and certain scholars have shown to be critical of any Bible version they choose.

The translation of the New World Translation stands to it's own credit and Jehovah's Witnesses also use other Bible versions as cross references because each Bible has it's own flavour of how it translates Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek texts into the English language. Often cross referencing can aid in getting the full sense of meaning.

It is not which version of a Bible makes all the big matter it is about WHO ACTUALLY is following the teachings of the scriptures and learn accurate knowledge.
Answered By: Smiling JW™ - 9/21/2012
I wouldnt. if im correct they take out or add in verses.
Answered By: skullhead - 9/20/2012
They knew exactly what they were doing!
They deliberately changed the NWT texts
to be biased of their teachings!
Answered By: Messenger4Truth - 9/20/2012
Excellent evidence Terry!!

The NWT is a proven bible translation that has upheld the authenticity of the original writings. Only those who have no other intention except to cast aspersions on Jehovah's organization would think otherwise!
Answered By: Bro. G - 9/20/2012
Yes. It is reliable. You can compare it to other modern English versions as many of the same corrections are made in both Protestant and Catholic ones. New Jerusalem Bible of the Catholics is very like it (even puts Yahweh into the OT).

Most the the texts considered "controversial" are corrected in non archaic English Bibles.

Much of what isn't, is still located in references such as Greek/Hebrew word dictionaries.

The NWT was made using every reference, Bible version, Manuscript (MSS), lexicon (LX) and codex they could get hold of.

I have a website full of online references you can go to and check (compare) for yourself.

http://debbie_pittman.tripod.com/

You can find an online NWT at http://www.jw.org

Debbie
Source(s):
http://www.biblegateway.comhttp://www.studylight.org/isb/ More resources (linked at my website, but these are my most used)
Answered By: debbiepittman - 9/20/2012
Its more reliable then any other Bible it has been thoroughly search for each and every text to make sure of its accuracy.
Answered By: farrah - 9/20/2012
Ironic you question their spelling but you can't even spell Jehovah right.


Can you be trusted to string two words together?
Answered By: Hong Kong Phooey - 9/20/2012
Responder states "IF YOU ARE GOING TO GIVE A THUMBS DOWN, THEN YOU ARE DISAGREEING WITH WHAT THE EXPERTS SAY AND THIS JUST SHOWS A PREJUDICE!"

To the responder: here are some more experts who contradict your experts:


Dr. Bruce M. Metzger, professor of New Testament at Princeton University, calls the NWT "a frightful mistranslation," "Erroneous" and "pernicious" "reprehensible" "If the Jehovah's Witnesses take this translation seriously, they are polytheists." (Professor of New Testament Language and Literature)
Dr. William Barclay, a leading Greek scholar, said "it is abundantly clear that a sect which can translate the New Testament like that is intellectually dishonest."
British scholar H.H. Rowley stated, "From beginning to end this volume is a shining example of how the Bible should not be translated."
"Well, as a backdrop, I was disturbed because they (Watchtower) had misquoted me in support of their translation." (These words were excerpted from the tape, "Martin and Julius Mantey on The New World Translation", Mantey is quoted on pages 1158-1159 of the Kingdom interlinear Translation)
Dr. Julius Mantey , author of A Manual Grammar of the Greek New Testament, calls the NWT "a shocking mistranslation." "Obsolete and incorrect." "It is neither scholarly nor reasonable to translate John 1:1 'The Word was a god.'"
"I have never read any New Testament so badly translated as The Kingdom Interlinear Translation of The Greek Scriptures.... it is a distortion of the New Testament. The translators used what J.B. Rotherham had translated in 1893, in modern speech, and changed the readings in scores of passages to state what Jehovah's Witnesses believe and teach. That is a distortion not a translation." (Julius Mantey , Depth Exploration in The New Testament (N.Y.: Vantage Pres, 1980), pp.136-137)
the translators of the NWT are "diabolical deceivers." (Julius Mantey in discussion with Walter Martin)

I can play this game as well

Here are the translators of the NWT:

Franz only took one 2-hour credit class of "Bible Greek" but 21 hours of classical Greek. According to the course catalog of 1911, Arthur Kensella was not a professor of Greek, as Franz wrote, but an "instructor in Greek." Kensella did not have a Ph.D. and he therefore taught entry-level courses.

2. Nathan H. Knorr: No training in biblical languages. Entered Brooklyn headquarters in 1923; 3rd president of Watchtower Bible and Track Society from 1942 to 1977. He died 1977 at age 72.

3. Milton G. Henschel: No training in biblical languages. He served as the private secretary and traveling companion to N. H. Knorr from the late 1940s until the early 1970s. He’s the 4th president of Watchtower Bible and Track Society from 1992 to 2000. After “stepping down”, he was followed by Don Adams as president.

4. Albert D. Schroeder: No training in biblical languages. He took 3 years of mechanical engineering, unspecified language courses in college, dropped out in 1932 and soon entered Brooklyn headquarters. He is a Registrar of "Gilead School" from 1942 to 1959.

5. Karl Klein: No training in biblical languages. Klein entered Brooklyn headquarters in 1925; member of Writing Dept. since 1950. He died 2001 at age 96.

6. George D. Gangas: No training in biblical languages. Greek-speaking Turkish national, he entered Brooklyn headquarters in 1928 as a Greek translator from English to modern Greek publications. He died 1994 at age 98

Edit: Many of your (to the responder by the way) members say not to trust wikipedia. LOL. Prove my sources are incorrect.
Source(s):
My notes
Answered By: Watchtower of Babel - 9/20/2012
AamishH
I have 15 bibles ,I never trusted the NWT when I first started to study with Jehovah's Witnesses now it is my most loved bible.It took me almost a year of cross checking & I have not once found fault with the NWT it is by far superiour to any other bible I have ever used..
Answered By: Lone Dissenter 4 A Piercing Light - 9/20/2012
The translators of the Bible into the NWT were Hebrew and Greek scholars from the 19th century. The OT translation came from a Hebrew scholar named R. Kittel. The NT from Greek scholars Westcott and Hort. They were not affiliated with Jehovah's Witnesses. When I first started studying with Jehovah's Witnesses we used the King James Version. We still use many different translations. I used the King James Version up until the 1970's and then the NWT became available to me. If you check out Wikipedia on the New World Translation you will find other scholars who think it is the most accurate translation. It really does not matter what translation you use because the truth is in all translations. The Trinity, Hellfire and Immortal Soul can be proved false no matter what translation is used. It is just a excuse when people say we use a different translation. Whenever we do Bible studies we use whatever translation the person has available.
Answered By: Mom C - 9/20/2012
Greetings,

First, the accuracy of the NWT is proven by facts such as standard definitions, rules of grammar, and translation principles.

You will notice that, like most critics of the NWT, this questioner did not include even one verse as an example of where the NWT was inaccurate. It is simply a prejudicial attack. This is because critics know very well that EVERY claim of so-called mistranslation by the NWT has been proven false. EVERY rendering by the NWT has been proven to be accurate and supported by translation principles and standard lexical references. There isn't a single verse rendering that cannot be supported by non-Witness original language lexicons & scholars. This has been done repeatedly even on Yahoo Answers.

The fact is that the NWT has been praised by many scholars even when they don't agree with the Witnesses belief:

The most recent is Jason BeDuhn in his book "Truth in Translation, Accuracy and Bias in English Translations of the New Testament." (Jason David BeDuhn, University Press of America)

"The translation is evidently the work of skilled and clever scholars..."-- Alexander Thompson, The Differentiator (British religious Journal)

"...the anonymous translators have certainly rendered the best manuscript texts...with scholarly ability and acumen." Charles Francis Potter, The Faith Men Live by

"The New Testament translation was made by a committee...that possessed an unusual competence in Greek."-- S. MacLean Gilmore, the Andover Newtion Quarterly, September 1966, Vol. 7, Number 1, pages 25-6.


Almost 40 years ago I had serious doubts about the NWT even being a good translation. My parents had been baptized as Witnesses and at a very basic level I knew the Witnesses were truly Christian in contrast to other religions. But, when it came to the NWT I assumed that it was probably no better than any other and at worse as possibly being biased. I just had no idea. So, I determined to gain enough knowledge and reference books so that I could check any question. I began collecting original language reference works, commentaries and anything I could lay my hands on. I also began to read and examine other translations (I now have about 150 different versions). Over the years I took every criticism and accusation against the NWT and thoroughly examined it, recording my research at first in binders and then on the computer.

What I personally found over the years is that in every case where the NWT is criticized by so-called "scholars" it has usually proved to be accurate, and at the very least its rendering is solidly based on the laws of translation such as following the original grammar and word definitions. In almost all cases I found that the NWT was more accurate than the vast majority of other translations. *Most* criticisms brought against it are usually themselves *unwarranted and unfairly biased. *

This is something that is being repeatedly proved even in this forum. That is why you mainly hear prejudicial comments, and unsupported accusations against the NWT by regular posters here. They know that when they raise a specific translation difference they will receive a scholarly response proving that the NWT translation is an accurate rendering of the original.

People who claim that Witnesses needed to translate "our own bible" in order to support our beliefs are being misled. Most of JW's beliefs had been long established before the NWT ever came into existence and at that time they used the KJV and the ASV.

Yours,

BAR-ANERGES
Answered By: BAR- ANERGES - 9/20/2012
His Holy Name is spelt: Jehovah. How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you mess up so badly? You are the example of the world that is not with Jehovah God.

Terry did a wonderful job and I don't see the need to repeat it. As the Bible says, the day will come when all will know it is Jehovah causing what is going on.
Answered By: Suzy - 9/20/2012
When these self proclaimed translators took on the job there were over 400 english versions of the bible available to them. There original mandate or reason for doing so was to promote the use of God's name. There first effort was to translate the NT or Greek Scriptures. With no solid basis for inserting the tetragrammaton YHWH some 237 times they released their RENDITION in 1950. Subsequent the OT or Hebrew Scriptures.

Along with inserting the (jw chosen name for God 'Jehovah') they without doubt made overt and subtle changes to texts, that would more directly support their doctrines. They can moan and groan about such assertions, but one must realize that they had a motive for doing the work.

It is that motive that should be suspect. Why with over 400 viable translations of the words of God, would they feel so special, so select, that they had to revise what God had cared for for over 1900 years?

Anyone with even a particle of common sense, must conclude, that they wanted the bible to say things differently than all the others. Otherwise why take on the massive project?

They now try and distance themselves from the people and effort to revise the bible, by saying that they will use any translation. But mark my words they believe in their heart of hearts that the NWT New World Translation is the only bible worth relying on. You can see by their desperate attempts to use outside worldly bible scholars to promote their revised addition.
Answered By: danman - 9/20/2012
You can read the Bible, but you can trust the Person about whom it is written. None can come to me except through the Father, said Jesus. If you are a pagan, and you worship God with all your heart, mind, and soul, and love your neighbour as yourself, then you will find the soul of Our Saviour when you read the Bible. You are also expected to read the Catechism by the Holy Pope Benedict, and change from your bad habits to the pure and sacred life of Jesus, Son of God.

Will You.???
Source(s):
SJC and the Catholic Bible.
Answered By: JosephV - 9/20/2012
That's not a question, it's a rant. And a total fail at that.
Answered By: Wendi888 - 9/20/2012
Hello. I'm an atheist and something of a bible scholar.

The NWT is an EXCELLENT translation. It is well thought of and a respected translation.

The only ones who dislike it are those who are biased against JWs
Answered By: Tor - 9/20/2012
It is equal if not superior to most if not all.

Have you personally read any if the NWT?

Feel free to go out to jw.org and you can see for yourself.

It is simple, easy to read, and you can check it with any other translation that you have in your possession.
Source(s):
One of Jehovah's Witnesses
Answered By: angelmusic1914 - 9/20/2012
IT TOOK 12 years, 3 months, and 11 days of painstaking work. On March 13, 1960, however, the final segment of text for a new Bible translation was completed. It was called the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures.
One year later, Jehovah’s Witnesses published this translation in a single volume. That edition in 1961 had a printing of one million copies. Today, the number of printed copies has passed the one hundred million mark, making the New World Translation one of the most widely distributed Bibles. What, though, prompted the Witnesses to prepare this translation? In order to understand and proclaim the message of the Holy Scriptures, Jehovah’s Witnesses have over the years used many different English Bible translations. While these versions have their points of merit, they are often colored by religious traditions and the creeds of Christendom. (Matthew 15:6) Jehovah’s Witnesses therefore recognized the need for a Bible translation that faithfully presented what is in the original inspired writings.
The first step toward filling this need was taken in October 1946 when Nathan H. Knorr, a member of the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses, proposed the production of a new Bible translation. On December 2, 1947, the New World Bible Translation Committee set out to prepare a translation that would be faithful to the original text, would embody the latest scholarly findings gleaned from newly discovered Bible manuscripts, and would use language readily understood by today’s readers.
With the publication of the first installment—the New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures—in 1950, it became evident that the translators had met their objectives. Bible texts that had previously been only dimly understood became dramatically clear. For instance, consider the perplexing text at Matthew 5:3: “Blessed are the poor in spirit.” (King James Version) It was rendered: “Happy are those conscious of their spiritual need.” The apostle Paul’s admonition rendered “be careful for nothing” (King James Version) was translated: “Do not be anxious over anything.” (Philippians 4:6) And the apostle John’s reference to “the concupiscence of the flesh” (Douay Version) reads, “the desire of the flesh.” (1 John 2:16) Clearly, the New World Translation opened up a new world of understanding.

Various scholars were impressed. For example, British Bible scholar Alexander Thomson noted that the New World Translation is outstanding in accurately rendering the Greek present tense. To illustrate: Ephesians 5:25 reads “Husbands, continue loving your wives” instead of saying merely “Husbands, love your wife.” (King James Version) “No other version appears to have exhibited this fine feature with such fulness and frequency,” said Thomson regarding the New World Translation.
Source(s):
Portions taken from the following link, and be sure and read all: http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2001842?q=new+world+translation&p=par
Answered By: A Zebra 4-ever ♥ - 9/20/2012
The English edition of the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures, published by Jehovah’s Witnesses, was prepared directly from the original languages by an anonymous committee. This version, in turn, has been the primary text used for translations into about 60 other languages. Translators for those languages did, however, make extensive comparisons with the original-language text. The New World Translation aims for a literal rendering of the original-language text whenever such a rendering would not hide its meaning. The translators seek to make the Bible as understandable to readers today as the original text was to readers in Bible times.

Some linguists have examined modern Bible translations—including the New World Translation—for examples of inaccuracy and bias. One such scholar is Jason David BeDuhn, associate professor of religious studies at Northern Arizona University in the United States. In 2003 he published a 200-page study of nine of “the Bibles most widely in use in the English-speaking world.”* His study examined several passages of Scripture that are controversial, for that is where “bias is most likely to interfere with translation.” For each passage, he compared the Greek text with the renderings of each English translation, and he looked for biased attempts to change the meaning. What is his assessment?

BeDuhn points out that the general public and many Bible scholars assume that the differences in the New World Translation (NW) are due to religious bias on the part of its translators. However, he states: “Most of the differences are due to the greater accuracy of the NW as a literal, conservative translation.” While BeDuhn disagrees with certain renderings of the New World Translation, he says that this version “emerges as the most accurate of the translations compared.” He calls it a “remarkably good” translation.

Dr. Benjamin Kedar, a Hebrew scholar in Israel, made a similar comment concerning the New World Translation. In 1989 he said: “This work reflects an honest endeavor to achieve an understanding of the text that is as accurate as possible. . . . I have never discovered in the New World Translation any biased intent to read something into the text that it does not contain.”

By all means, do your research and then ask us more definitive questions.
Answered By: Brenda - 9/20/2012
Jehovah was behind the NWT, that's why his name is back in.

John 17:3 reads, This means everlasting life, their taking in knowledge of you, the only true God, and of the one whom you sent forth, Jesus Christ.

Accurate knowledge... Go on, have a study with one of Jehovah's Witnesses, you never know, you might just see the truth :-)
Source(s):
Jehovah's Witness
Answered By: Bubbles™ - 9/20/2012
Previous
1
Sponsored results
Found: Hiring Positions Near You. $10.50 - $83.75/hr. Apply Online.
HiringJobs.WorkGrabber.net
Search for Local Jobs. Find Answers on Ask.com.
Ask.com/Local Jobs
$87/hr Part-Time Job Openings. Apply Today, Get Hired Tomorrow!
dailyjobcheck.com
New job opportunities added daily. Search Virginia jobs now!
VirginiaJobNetwork.com

Other Career Questions

What do you think the job requirements are for the people that review Reported Q &A in Religion & Spirituality? Background/Educational requirements/special skill sets?
4 answers - Asked By: Mr. Panky - 11/27/2010
This is the RELIGION & SPIRITUALITY SECTION! Of course we're going to give Bible quotes. It wouldn't be a RELIGION & SPIRITUALITY SECTION if we didn't give Bible quotes. It's, like, our job to give Bible quotes. If this bothers you, then why do you come on this particular section? You're a glutton for punishment and that's not our fault. We can't help you if you love to put yourself in misery. We have every right to give Bible quotes. It's how we Christians learn from each other.
17 answers - Asked By: Lifted by God's grace - 8/29/2008
Specifically for Religion and Spirituality? Any job descriptions floating around from Career Boards?
5 answers - Asked By: Mr. Panky - 11/11/2010

Content is not owned or controlled by Monster. Any content concerns should be addressed with Yahoo!
Yahoo! Does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. Yahoo! Disclaimer.

Popular Questions

So today I went in for an interview and I was going in for the 2nd interview by the head chief executive. now this is where it got weird, so she asked me about my previous jobs and said how much she liked that product over that product. then she started talking about her daughter? an her divorce ...then how she didn't finish college because she was making more money doing what she did for this company ... then she talked about how her teenage daughter is a handful... I just played it cool thinking she was using some sort of psychology thing to trick me into saying something stupid. the interview ended and she seemed happy an I was escorted to the door... now I'm freaking confused? is this normal behavior for an executive? like it felt like she was going to burst into tears at one point and tell me her life problems... is this normal? was she trying to see how I react or something?
6 answers - Asked By: Clone - 11/7/2012
Wen you apply at a job and they ask how mch you want as a salary what do you say?
2 answers - Asked By: Colette - 11/24/2011
Basically- no degree, although I have tried completing one in the past and stopped because of physical and mental health issues which were overwhelming to deal with along with going to classes full time. I'm not stupid and I am quite articulate. I am 23 and have only worked for about two years retail in high school and stopped working to go to university. I worked a few months in 2010 retail after I dropped out but it was only a seasonal position, and the only reason why I have not been able to constantly work is because of mental health issues. I had also tried going back to community college during my free time since i left university in 2008/9 and I had panic attacks while in community college, which made my anxiety worse from then on. Well recently I met a good doctor and he prescribed me some meds that are stabilizing my moods and I feel the best I've felt in years, and I'm ready to work. Thing is, I don't know how to get a job now since I've spent literally years being depressed and anxious doing nothing. I don't really have anything to put on my resume, and I never finished my AA degree either. All I've done is cashiering and although I do the job well and I get promoted easily when I do these jobs because I'm a hard worker and I try to go above and beyond what they ask of me,which is the attitude I have no matter what kind of work I'm doing as long as I'm getting paid. But I hate cashiering because it's too easy and I want a job that is more interesting. Any suggestions for me on how to get a job that is NOT Retail with the type of background I have right now? I also realize I have to go to college to get certain types of jobs, I am talking about what I can do right here right now.
1 answer - Asked By: Alex Prieto - 10/14/2012
Recently I have overlooked for a project at work and I am unable to accept it why? I am hard working, dedicated, maintain a very professional decorum, very cordial with my colleagues and bosses, give respect to one and all. Still people who take the p***, argue with managers, gossip mongers have been selected for some very responsible positions at work. I seriously can't get my head around it why, why unprofessional people who have no work ethics being selected over me, whereas I have a track record of excellent performance and never shy away from any work my manager ask me to do? I am at my lowest point and not getting hold of my manager to ask the question why not me, why them who can't even bother? I am feeling like a complete loser, giving years to this place, building my performance, trust and this is how I get rewarded. Why my life is so shit, anything I wish for turns to dust?
1 answer - Asked By: network7 - 11/6/2012
As stated in my question I've applied for multiple jobs and gotten no job interview, you name a place I've applied there. I've said i will work ridiculous hours from like 12am to 5am and nothing. I've said I am willing to work weekends public holidays everything and I have gotten nothing back I am so desperate for money it's not funny.
9 answers - Asked By: Jamie - 1/9/2012
So I have a nice white button up shirt, business skirt and pants, and a suit jacket. I'm applying for a software development job and I'm very short and can look young so I'm trying to look adult, yet professional. I'm also attractive so I'm trying not to look too sexy. For the career fair I'm thinking of wearing just my nice shirt and a skirt with low heels. My reasoning being it's approachable and attractive without going overboard since the career fair hosts are mostly younger male recent grads. I want to be remembered but not intimidating. For my interviews I was thinking pants, suit jacket (power suit). My reasoning being it'll be older execs and HR people (mostly women) so less sexy with the pants but more powerful with the suit jacket. What do you think?!
2 answers - Asked By: Beast - 9/23/2012
I'm really having a hard time finding a job. I'm not sure why employers aren't contacting me :( I have about 4 years in expereince ( about 1 year of management) Well, here it is Jon smith Erlanger KY, USA Cell: +1-859-111-1111 E-mail:abc.def@outlook.com OBJECTIVE Obtain a position as a project manager/coordinator allowing me to utilize my administrative, organizational and problem-solving skills with a growing organization to mutually enhance growth of professional development and success. WORK EXPERIENCE ATS Jun 2012 – Apr 2013 Project Manager I: Managed projects development and staff in different divisions to achieve projects goals through practices of planning, executing and analyzing project-related tasks. Duties, responsibilities and contributions to assigned projects include the following: • Prepare and create project scopes, SWOT analysis reports and statements of work as assigned. • Visit anticipated project sites and create assessments for necessary work. • Analyze given scopes to assist engineers into reaching projects’ objectives. • Examine and manage available resources relating to materials and manpower. • Coordinate staff and arrange regular meetings. • Inspect daily operations and quality of products used on premise. • Implement solutions to resolve complex jobs relating to the project. • Manage and ensure that operations are executed in accordance to project scope and SOW. • Review and submit documents for projects deliverables/submittals and create schedules for subcontractors. • Document all events occurred during project life cycle and submit reports to senior management. Assigned Projects: 1- Conference Rooms IT/Multimedia Project Duration: Jun 2012 – Dec 2012 2- Military Base Renovation Project Duration: Aug 2012 – Aug 2013 AT&T / U-verse Division Oct 2011 – Feb 2012 Command Center Agent II: Applied knowledge to solve common and complex related issues to consumer’s services and devices. The position allowed for individual work at minimum supervision and within teams when necessary. Duties of the position included: •Provide phone/virtual support to internal and external customers. •Audit reports submitted by technicians and follow up with customers. •Implement and updated solutions within workflow system (WFE system). •Interact with IT department personnel to resolve common issues. •Provide assistance to first level support agents. •Maintain database and accounts for customers. Cleve’s Connections May 2009 – Nov 2010 IT Specialist: Provided hands-on and virtual administration for all IT related topics and managed sales for all devices and services. This included consulting, providing solutions, and improving efficiency for small businesses in design and security areas. Tasks performed while working included: • Resolve & close all open cases submitted by staff or customers. • Setup and manage user accounts through Active Directory. • Monitor network activities and logs and report system bugs, downtimes or crashes. • On-site maintenance and installation of network equipment and computer hardware/software. • Perform system setup operations and data backups as requested. • Create case analysis and audit reports given by technicians. • On-call support 24/7. EDUCATION • Devry University, Cincinnati OH Bachelor in Management Graduation: 2012 • Cincinnati State, Cincinnati OH Associate in Network Administration Graduation: Transfer 2010 To Andy: What does my Devry have to do with anything? for profit school? I'm not sure what college you graduated from, but in the real world experience weights more than a piece of paper stating you've completed few written assignments and imaginary projects. SMH!
3 answers - Asked By: Zaid I - 5/8/2013
I am currently a 1st year irregular college student taking I.T. I transferred schools and my majors never got credited. But it's okay because i am slowly getting the logics in programming in Java. This next semester i am taking a System Analysis and Design(SADSIGN) and i am getting nervous because even though i am pretty good at logics, i am not that good at coding. But since it is a case study, we will be on group, we will be four i think. Project manager, Analyst, Documentation, and the programmer. I am asking what jobs i can get after graduating I.T. because what if i graduated I.T. and still not that good at coding, i am hoping that there will be a jobs that will require less programming. Like Database manager or in Multimedia or in charge of Network. So is there jobs that doesn't require hardcore programming skills?
2 answers - Asked By: Jay p*e - 5/6/2013
Account Executive Hospitality Manager Sales Representative Editorial Assistant Advertising Manager Hotel Manager Personnel Specialist Writer/Author Association Administrator Presenter Special Events Coordinator Political Aide Promotions Manager Speech Writer Consumer Affairs Specialist Sportscaster Public Information Officer Communications Director Public Relations Specialist Radio/TV Announcer Technical Writer Telemarketing Specialist Customer Service Rep. Fund Raiser Training & Development Specialist Events Planner Flight Attendant Youth Worker Media Manager Recruiter Market Research Analyst Community Action Director Recreation/Attractions Manager Restaurant Manager Campaign Manager Development Director Script Writer Photojournalist Advertising Copywriter Museum Director Greeting Card Writer Production Assistant Actor, Mime Narrator Stage Manager Director Impersonator Make-up Artist Stunt Coordinator Booking Agent Talent Scout Drama Coach Stand-in Playwright Stage Manager Movie Theater Manager
2 answers - Asked By: Jolynn - 4/28/2013
Can someone tell me te difference between computer science and a computer engineering major. Is it the same?
2 answers - Asked By: Rosalva - 5/6/2013
The question explains it, i am thinking of going to an engineering high school but of course it will focus on other stuff too but still. What kind of jobs can you get because i dont want to be a mechanic(no offence to any) but please help me!
2 answers - Asked By: hungergameslover - 5/13/2013
Is there any difference between a "nurse practitioner" and an "advanced registered nurse practitioner"?
1 answer - Asked By: lucysmom - 3/27/2006
L want to study medicine and work as a doctor but l am limited due to luck of required monyes. however l swtched on to anther career but still within my career interests as a care giver, but this is somthing to do with sales and marketing in the pharmcitical industry.
2 answers - Asked By: tonnydanabwembya - 12/24/2005
3 answers - Asked By: hubbard_billy - 2/24/2006
Advances in technology will soon cause 70-80?nemployment in the USA. How will all those millions of people eat, then? That will lead to a conflict between Social Market-ists (gov't imposed wealth redistribution) and Free Market-ists (no gov't imposed wealth redistribution). First, the Luddite Fallacy. It WAS valid UNTIL machines could do most human mental functions better than humans. Some experts are already saying this, but generally it seems like the American Society and its leaders are proceeding in utter ignorance. You probably know about all the technologies that now exist or will soon be up & running, & which will massively reduce the need for human labor in the economy, thus MAKING MOST HUMANS UNNECESSARY to the economy. Some facts: (1) A couple weeks ago all the toll booth workers on the Golden Gate Bridge were all dismissed because the gov't bought a machine to handle everything. (2) Computer voice recognition already exists, in programs such as Siri and Google Voice and others. But very soon these programs will be so much better. Virtually all the human-staffed customer service call centers will disappear very soon. Human office receptions will be mostly eliminated. (3) McDonald's already has a prototype version of their fast food restaurant with NO human workers on site. (4) Wal-Mart & other retailers already have plans for stores with NO human cashiers. (5) Google's driverless cars and trucks will soon eliminate most drivers of commercial trucks & taxi cabs. (6) IBM's computer "Watson" defeated the best human players on "Jeopardy" about a year ago. Watson had to hear and understand host Alex Trebeck's spoken speech just like the human contestants. IBM created Watson to replace Medical Doctors. The plan is that nurses and nurses practitioners will take data from patients (temperate, blood pressure, reports of pains, etc.), enter that into Watson, and Watson will order tests and make prescriptions and treatment plans. Unlike human doctors, Watson will KNOW EVERYTHING about medical science. Doctor errors currently kill about 100,000 patients per year in hospitals alone. Patients will DEMAND to be diagnosed by Watson (or other equivalent) & have a prescription by Watson, since studies will show that patients fare so MUCH better when Watson is their “doctor,” and the cost will be MUCH less. (7) Computers are now replacing the lawyers that formerly had to spend massive hours read through massive amounts of documents turned over to the opposing side in "discovery" in civil lawsuits. Documents now are turned over in digital form, and computers search in seconds them looking for key words and phrases. (8) Soon publishers will stop printing books on paper. Everyone will have an e-Reader device. That will be the END of every physical library and bookstore. (9) Soon computers will be able to general characters in movies that are indistinguishable from real humans. Not only actors will lose their jobs, but costume people, makeup people, scene construction people, camera operators, key grips, electricians, lighting experts, etc. (10) New machines are replacing the humans who pick vegetables in fields. (11) New machines are replacing human security guards. (12) Human airplane pilots, both in the military and in commercial service, will soon be extinct. The FAA has already approved testing of drone planes for commercial transportation of non-human cargo. (13) Most trades on Wall Street are already being made by computers. (14) The U.S. Postal Service is doomed. Paying thousands of people to drive around in little trucks to deliver little printed pieces of paper to each household each day is going to seem more and more like idiocy. (15) Most of the reviews and analysis currently being done by human accountants, actuaries, tax experts, and other financial analysts and consultants will be done must better, more more quickly, and much more accurately, by computers. (16) Web sites already are using computer programs to write the text for stories that report on sports games. The program integrates the statistics from the game into a story text that seems to have been written by a human being. (17)Most education at the college and high school level will soon be done online, eliminating a massive number of workers. Thus, GIGANTIC UNEMPLOYMENT, in the range of 70-80?is coming soon to the USA. This will result in Rio De Janeiro type slums all over the USA. That will result in calls for gov't wealth redistribution, which will result in Armed Revolution, Counter-Revolution, concentration camps, & Latin American-style death squads. The rich and ultra-rich are never going to let any government get control of their wealth. Huge bloody CONFLICT is coming. * * * Politicians keep repeating the old canard that the solution is to train and retrain Americans for the "jobs of the future." But they are either morons or are lying, since anyone who thinks about it can easily see that even if every American worker had an engineering degree or a computer science degree, the economy just doesn't need that many engineers and computer scientists. * * * * * * * Why don't more people see this? Why aren't more people talking about this? We are facing soon a catastrophe in the USA (and in other places) on par of the plagues in Europe that killed half of the population in certain areas, and on par with the depopulation in Europe brought about by WWI and WWII. Sure, you can just repeat the Luddite Fallacy, and proclaim that the economy will always create enough jobs for most people to survive. But there is no law of economics that says that any law of economics will always operate the same. Laws of economics are not like the laws of physics. Economies and life forms can and do evolve in fundamental ways that make former economic models and ways of life obsolete. I'm sure the last tribe of Neanderthals were certain that nothing was ever going to change, right before the Homo Sapiens swooped down on them, chased them into a dead end canyon were other Homo Sapiens were lying in wait with big clubs. * * * * * * * * * In the past the Luddite Fallacy was valid since machines always needed the mental acuity that only human operators could provide, and machines frequently needed maintenance by skilled human hands and minds. But now machines have mental functions that equal or surpass what humans can provide in most work functions. And computers aren't so much repaired anymore as just thrown away and replaced. How many cell phone repair shops have you ever seen? Even most laptop computers are replaced rather than repaired. More and more laptop computers never even need to be repaired for years and years. In short, when the economy has no use for most Americans, all h*ll is going to brake loose, & that's coming soon. * * * * *
2 answers - Asked By: Perro Americano Invicto - 5/16/2013
I know that Escrow is within Title industry in Texas. What would be the best way to get my foot in the door. I am assuming I will have to start as an Escrow assistant and work my way up, but I would really like to find out more about this career path. How does an officer usually get licensed? Are there classes we need to take and exam to take? Any response is appreciated.
2 answers - Asked By: schang25 - 2/10/2006
1 answer - Asked By: Big D - 5/3/2013
I've always freelanced as a web designer and might have an opportunity to work at a large ad agency. sorta nervous about the culture and role, so I was wondering if I could solicit feedback about the type of strengths I might need to develop, ie., strong project management (learn to use basecamp!), etc. I've held jobs on the client side as a web marketing manager and before that freelanced -- but on the very small scale. anyone with similiar experiences or feedback I'd love to hear from you!
2 answers - Asked By: webguy - 2/11/2006
I have to get an electrican to fix an overloaded circuit and possible short. so do you tip and if so, how much?
4 answers - Asked By: speedlvr_8 - 12/29/2005
Search SEARCH

Popular Job Searches

Explore Jobs and Career Opportunities

Popular Program Searches

Further Your Career With A Degree

Popular Articles

Browse Articles Related To Careers
2013 Marketing Jobs Outlook Article Rating
The US may be facing another year of anemic hiring overall, but that won't be the case in the high-orbit world of multichannel, digital media marketing.
2013 Engineering Jobs Outlook Article Rating
Engineers will find job opportunities in select disciplines in 2013, with candidates who are all-around, client-oriented businesspeople in demand.
Best-Paying Jobs by MajorArticle Rating
What could you earn with a particular four-year degree? Find out by checking out this list of the top-paying jobs for 20 of the most common majors.
Eight High-Paying, Secure JobsArticle Rating
Want to earn a good salary and enjoy a measure of job security as well? Check out these well-paying jobs on tap for fast growth in the coming years.
2013 Finance Jobs OutlookArticle Rating
Three things predict whether your finance job search will fly or flop in 2013: your skills, your industry knowledge and (surprise!) the federal budget.

Monster Communities

Teaching Community
Where teachers meet and learn.
ArtBistro
Create and connect.
Excelle
Networking for the career-minded woman.
Nursing Link
Where nurses call the shots.
More Monster Communities

Monster Partners

Scholarships
Scholarships, financial aid and more ways to pay for school.
Education.org
Find top campus and online degree programs.
Military.com
Military portal for the US Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps and Coast Guard.
Financial Aid
Scholarships & financial aid.
Staffing for Government Jobs
Staffing and hiring solutions for federal government agency jobs.
More Monster Partners

Job Hunt Strategy

Six Ways to Make a Recruiter Hate You
If you want to blow your chances with recruiters -- and, by extension, with the companies they work for -- here are six perfect ways to do so.

Resumes & Cover Letters

Rev Up Your Resume to Relocate
Hoping to relocate? Get the ball rolling on landing the right job in the right location with these expert resume and cover letter tips.

Interviewing

100 Potential Interview Questions
Interview questions can run the gamut. You probably won't face all 100 of these, but you should still be prepared to answer at least some of them.

Salary & Benefits

10 Questions to Ask When Negotiating Salary
Most of us aren't natural negotiators, but asking these 10 questions during salary negotiations can help you get everything you deserve.

Employee Sourcing

Alt text
November Monster Employment Index Grows 13% Year-Over-Year, Tenth Consecutive Month of Positive Annual Growth.

For Seekers

Campus and Online Degrees
Advance your career and earn more with an online degree.
Free Salary Wizard
What are you worth? Find out and negotiate a better salary.
Research Careers
Get information on jobs and career paths to help guide your choices
Questions & Answers
Find answers to all your career related questions -- powered by Yahoo! Answers
Resume Distribution Service
Our distribution service puts your resume right in the hands of recruiters.
Resume Writing Services
Our experts will craft a keyword-rich resume that stands out in the crowd.
More Career Resources

For Employers

Career Ad Network
Target your job posting to more candidates on thousands of websites.
Hire Right Background Checks
Explore our background check packages to improve the quality of your hires.
Hiring Home Page
Find the best candidates for your business with Monster hiring solutions.
Job Postings
Find the right solution for your hiring needs. Starting at $99.
Power Resume Search
Monster's new search technology precisely matches people with your jobs.
Resource Center
Find staffing insights, labor trends, HR best practices and more.
Target Post
Connect with skilled, hourly and administrative candidates for only $99.

Social Media

Jobs on Twitter
Find jobs in your area and industry.
Monster Careers
Tune into our career advice and discussions tackling a wide range of topics and industries.
Monster Corporate & PR
Stay up-to-date on the latest news. Get the 'Who', 'What', 'When', and 'Why' on all things Monster related.
Monster Customer Service
Got a Monster question? We've got the answer. Whether you're a job seeker or employer, we can help you find the answers you need.
Monster for Employers
Find advice on hiring.
Follow Us
Check out our many pages and stay connected with the latest industry news, events, career advice and job openings.

Other Links

Advice Forums
Tap into Monster's online career forums and share advice with experts.
Monster Company Profiles
Explore companies and get information to guide your career decisions.
Compare Salaries
See how your pay stacks up to others in your field.
iPhone Application
Download the Monster app for iPhone and iPod touch.
Monster Job Seeker Blog
Monster Job Seeker Blog.
Monster Thinking Blog
Monster's Recruitment Trends Blog.
Jobs & Career Resources
Search Jobs:
For Employers: Post Jobs | Search Resumes | Advertise
About Monster | Work for Monster | Advertise with Us | AdChoices | Partner with Us | Investor Relations | Social Media
Terms of Use | Privacy Center | Accessibility Centre | Help | Security | Contact Us | Sitemap | Mobile
©2013 Monster - All Rights Reserved U.S. Patents No. 5,832,497; 7,599,930 B1; 7,827,125 and 7,836,060 MWW - Looking for Monster Cable? - V: 2013.1.0.14-223
eTrustLogo