Search SEARCH

Liberals what good is raising taxes at the rate the government is spending our money?

First, there is no evidence that tax increases will actually solve our troubles. On the contrary, years of data from around the world show that when nations try to solve a fiscal crisis primarily by raising tax revenues, they tend to fail. In contrast, fiscal approaches based on entitlement reform and spending cuts tend to succeed. American Enterprise Institute economists Kevin Hassett, Andrew Biggs and Matthew Jensen examined the experiences of 21 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries between 1970 and 2007. They found that countries with successful fiscal reforms, on average, closed 85% of their budget gaps with spending cuts. The countries with failed reforms, on average, relied at least 50% on tax increases. President Obama's strategy falls firmly in the latter camp. After discounting the accounting tricks that create fictitious spending cuts, the president's plan would impose about $3 in tax hikes for every $1 in spending cuts. That is, his approach would probably land America in the "failed attempt" column. Five years down the line, we would be in the same fiscal mess we are in today, just with higher taxes and a bigger government. Second, tax hikes aimed at small segments of the population wouldn't raise much in revenues. Consider the "Buffett Rule" that the president spent many months promoting. According to the Joint Committee on Taxation, it would raise about $47 billion over a decade. The federal government currently spends about $4 billion more per day than it takes in. The Buffett Rule, then, would raise about enough next year to cover 28 hours of government overspending. Heritage Foundation economist Curtis Dubay finds that closing the deficit solely by raising the two highest tax brackets would require hiking them to 159% and 166%, respectively. Third, as economists and business executives have noted repeatedly, raising taxes on families earning over $250,000 per year is effectively a massive tax hike on small businesses. Most small businesses today organize as S-corporations or other pass-through entities; their income is taxed as personal income. A study by Ernst and Young shows that Obama's proposed tax hike would force these small businesses to eliminate about 710,000 jobs. Moreover, these households already bear a great deal of tax liability. According to the most recent Internal Revenue Service data, those earning $250,000 and above -- roughly 2% of all taxpayers -- earn 22% of income, but pay 45% of all federal income taxes. Simply put, increasing tax rates on the wealthy is not a serious approach to solving America's fiscal woes. The problem is purely one of excessive spending, not inadequate taxing.

Asked By: Wrp - 12/6/2012
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
My question is, why pay taxes when the government just prints money?
Answered By: Libertarian Confederate - 12/6/2012
Additional Answers (5)
Good cutting and pasting, but spending is down under Obama. http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/report_under_obama_taxes_deficit_and_spending_all_down_20120516/
Answered By: ★Ŕ♡MΛŔƐ★ - 12/6/2012
 
Another wasted cut and paste rant that only serves to show you do not understand the proposals. No one thinks simply raising the rates on the top 2% will solve our fiscal woes. There are also cuts being proposed. Also ending some loopholes in the tax code would increase revenues... More
Answered By: March2 - 12/6/2012
 
You copied and pasted a column written by a member of a conservative think tank. Now try and express an opinion in your own words and convince us that you actually know what you are talking about. For all you know, what those columnists are saying could be completely wrong. But you repeat it because it matches your... More
Answered By: Davros - 12/6/2012
 
because with the tax hikes we can fund obamas government for 9 days. and that is a step in the right direction.
Answered By: half honky half donky - 12/6/2012
 
if you just look at America, the economy has done best when the incremental tax rate was the highest. that may not be correct from the standpoint of dogmatic ideology, but empirically it is a fact. The last time we generated surpluses, the tax rate was 39.6%. Both the Reagan tax cuts and the Bush tax cuts caused a... More
Answered By: lare - 12/7/2012
 
Sponsored results
(86) Local Jobs Paying $27-$86/Hour- Available Now. Apply Online.
All-Hiring.net/Jobs
Over 483 Local Jobs Now Hiring In Your Area. $18-$87/Hr - Apply Today!
Jobs.Quick-com
Work At Home Jobs Make $87/HR, Jobs Seen On TV. Jobs Hiring Now
www.HomeJobs-Finder.info
Drive Your Car - Make up to $600 Per Weekend. Work When You Want.
uber.com/Sign-Up-Now

Other Career Questions

What is your current job? Why did you choose this job? What do you enjoy about your job? What do you dislike about your job? What would be your perfect job? Would you rather have this j...
3 answers - Asked By: drop pants not bombs!.♥ - 3/2/2010
Where are the jobs? Is productivity and globalization creating a permanent “recession” of jobs? My main issue is I am doing a paper for school and have no idea where to begin. I was hoping suggestions...
4 answers - Asked By: bayebd24【ツ】 - 11/21/2007
Hi ok im 19 and about to start college to do an acess course into a university. Ive been browsing through all the courses and im tottaly stuck! I thought politics but im scared ill end up with some r...
1 answers - Asked By: roseparkerly - 1/26/2009

Content is not owned or controlled by Monster. Any content concerns should be addressed with Yahoo!
Yahoo! Does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. Yahoo! Disclaimer.

Popular Articles

Best-Paying Work-from-Home Jobs Article Rating
It’s easier than ever to work from home. Of course, not every job is a mobile job, and some companies aren’t interested in having their employees work from home.
2013 Marketing Jobs Outlook Article Rating
The US may be facing another year of anemic hiring overall, but that won't be the case in the high-orbit world of multichannel, digital media marketing.
For Employers: Post Jobs | Search Resumes | Advertise
About Monster | Work for Monster | Advertise with Us | AdChoices | Partner with Us | Investor Relations | Social Media
Terms of Use | Privacy Center | Accessibility Center | Help | Security | Contact Us | Sitemap | Mobile
©2014 Monster - All Rights Reserved U.S. Patents No. 5,832,497; 7,599,930 B1; 7,827,125 and 7,836,060 MWW - Looking for Monster Cable? - V: 2014.1.40.24-214
eTrustLogo