 | He is a Police officer near Pittsburgh and may loose his job because he posted an offensive joke. What is the joke? Is it really that offensive?
1 answer - Asked By: jzoop1 - 12/16/2011 |
| |
 | 3 answers - Asked By: bigdadnew2009 - 8/28/2009 |
| |
| I am going to navy boot camp here soon, I am a girl obviously I am 21 years old and very petite. if that matters any. But I am so nervous and scared. How your experience in boot camp? and whats it like to be in the navy?
|
| |
 | First one that can list some will be given best answer. :D
anyooooonneeee?
1 answer - Asked By: Bar of Soap - 5/21/2009 |
| |
 | I recently applied for a position with another company. The direct hiring manager knew that my current employer was unaware of my search. I would have given notice of course. In any event, the Executive Director ran into our Chief Operating Officer at a conference and mentioned that I was applying for a position within their company. The position had not been formally offered to me and I had not yet authorized this new company to contact my current employer.
Is this not a violation of my privacy rights? Should this not be kept quiet until I give authorization to contact references and then, shouldn't only those that I list as references be contacted and/or HR Department?
I wanted to speak to my current supervisor once the position was formally offered to me BEFORE reference checks were done. This could have created a very bad situation for me, but luckily it did not.
In any event, I cannot help that my rights were violated. Am I correct or incorrect?
I also wanted to add that I had not yet authorized the potential employer to contact my current employer. Wherever I have applied, I have always had to sign a consent and release authorizing them to conduct the reference checks, but that may only be applicable to the world of non-profit.
1 answer - Asked By: Aaminah - 10/3/2007 |
| |
| The company’s chief privacy officer Erin Egan announced in a statement on Friday.
The announcement follows reports that potential employers have pushed for access to applicants accounts — either asking applicants for their usernames and passwords or asking them to log into their accounts during an interview. Meanwhile, some universities require their student athletes to friend a coach or compliance officer who can keep tabs on their Facebook accounts, even if those accounts are not public.
Sharing or soliciting a Facebook password is against the social network’s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities.
“This practice undermines the privacy expectations and the security of both the user and the user’s friends,” Egan wrote on the Facebook Privacy blog. “It also potentially exposes the employer who seeks this access to unanticipated legal liability.”
Among the risks to employers, Egan says, are that they will come across information such as age or sexual orientation that could open them up to claims of discrimination if the applicant doesn’t get the job. Employers may also become responsible for information they uncover while pursuing private profiles, such as that which suggests a crime.
|
| |
 | |
| |
| |
| |
 | And what is the difference between operational, administrative, organizational and executive when it comes to these titles? I don't have a title and I am trying to figure out what fits.
1 answer - Asked By: Berlin Doll - 7/18/2007 |
| |
| So yesterday me and my best friend were out shopping, a bit far from home, So we bought a bunch of crap at wal-mart to bring to my house as we where having a sleepover, anyways we spend a bit too much time at the mall, and basically we had to run to the ferry which we missed (it looked like my friend was chasing me, So this police officer saw us running (ON the sidewalk) So then he pulled up half a block a head of us and put his lights and sirens on!, At first my friend and I where looking around, a few seconds later we approached the car, because we heard the officer shouting (we learned at us) and he asked us in a tone of voice (like we where just a couple of thugs) why we where running, then he asked to see our bags and searched for the receipts, then he just drove off, I feel really bad about this, I am only 14 and have never had any problems with the police, in fact my 2nd cousin was the chief of police in Vancouver (where I live), So I felt like my privacy was invaded, All I was guilty of is spending too much time shopping, and arriving home half an hour late, was it necessary for him to make a big scene and turn on his sirens, and lights, He asked me if I shoplifted too, and I was p****d, Like I would go up to a wal-mart employee, tell them I am taking stuff from the store, ask for a bag and a receipt, I mean really, this guy was probably new on the job (Russian accent) anyways is this unfair at all?
|
| |
 | My friend told me the police pulled her over. She had weed on her, like a couple of nickels. She told me the police officer told her he didn't want to arrest her. He said "you better tell me if you have any drugs in the car. Do you? If you tell me the truth I won't lock you up I will let you go but if I find out your lying and I find drugs then I won't let you go and I'll arrest you. She admitted yes to the officer and handed over the weed so he would let her go like he said he would and she said she was sorry she won't do it again. Of course he arrested her anyway. He continued to call back up. About 7 other police squad cars arrived and the chief of the police district like there was a murder or somethin, and they had female officers search her body and they searched the car. The female officers made her take her clothes off outside in the back side of the police car. She had to pull her panties down and everything and take her shirt, bra and shoes and socks off. Then they arrested her and she was in jail all night til' the morning. She wasn't bothering anyone and she is a really sweet person. I never heard of anything like this. Doesn't she have a right to privacy? They ended up arresting her anyway and impounding her car. Is there a name for this like arrested by deception or something? Also shouldn't she have a right to privacy? Why would she have to strip almost naked for them. I heard on a jail show on cable in some states in the U.S. (like California) it's illegal to do a strip search and the police can lose their job if they do it. Violation of right to privacy from the HIPPA act law. I know weed is illegal and they did have to arrest her but they could have let her go if they really wanted to like they said they would. The point is they deceived her to get her to admit it and they tricked her. What is this called and can she sue the police and the city for this?
Also if she didn' tell them where it was and told them no what would have happened then, when they ended up finding it on their own?
@Taziketo my friend is not a liar she is always honest and she would not make up something like this. Even though she smokes pot she still believes in honesty. People can still be a good person to others and it doesn't mean they are mean person just cause they smoke pot She doesn't hurt people and even when she's high she drives the speed limit and is responsible stopping at every red light and stop sign. Sometimes I don't even know she's high cause she acts the same when she's high as when she's not high. I have rode in her car with her before. She tells the truth to the police and she would even tell them if she had weed on her even if they didn't offer to not arrest her for the truth. What benefit would she get by lying that a bunch of cops showed up like that? I have seen stuff like this before. We live in the city of Chicago and cops do this a lot here. They are the ones that over exaggereated by bringin 6 or 7 cops cars for some stupid pot misdemeanor not her. She didn't exaggera
|
| |
 | Http://www.bakersfieldnow.com/news/investigations/Eyewitness-News-investigation-Should-officers-be-randomly-tested-for-drugs-138613969.html
-
So why aren't local law enforcement officers, who carry guns, held to the same standards?
Local lawmakers sound off on random drug testing >>
The answer is simple: The topic has never been seriously discussed during past union negotiations.
"It's shocking, it's embarrassing, but it's reality," said Kern County Sheriff Donny Youngblood.
Each officer undergoes drug testing as part of the hiring process, as well as a polygraph test, added two years ago. And, officers can be faced with drug testing for "reasonable suspicion" of being under the influence.
But neither the Bakersfield Police Department nor the Kern County Sheriff's Office conducts random drug testing.
See how random drug testing works for the LAPD >>
In December, veteran Bakersfield Officer Ofelio Lopez was arrested for allegedly pocketing and using drugs that he confiscated on the job. It was just the latest such incident to hit public consciousness.
"Well, I think random drug testing would be good for all public employment agencies," Bakersfield Police Chief Greg Williamson said. "Not only because we're held to a higher standard, but that we really are trying to be transparent with the public. It goes a long way to building public trust if they know we are out there to serve them without having drugs in their system,."
When it comes to California law, there is none regarding random drug testing. Some law enforcement agencies have it, and some don't. It's their choice, as long as their unions agree.
So, why aren't local police conducting random drug testing?
"Well, I think informally its been discussed in the past," Williamson said. "Since I've been the chief of police, we haven't been involved in contract negotiations. So we haven't had the opportunities to discuss it, and it has not been brought forward due to the lack of negotiations."
Youngblood also voiced support for enacting a system of random drug testing. He went as far as calling on the union to begin negotiations over testing. That move, he said, was prompted by the Eyewitness News inquiry.
The sheriff acknowledged that at least two officers in recent years were fired for methamphetamine use. But, a public records request to the sheriff's department revealed that from 2008-11, of 30 officers suspected of illegal drug use, 10 tested positive. Citing privacy laws, the department would not discuss what happened next.
"We know that deputy sheriffs are human beings, and they make mistakes, and they do stupid things sometimes," Youngblood said. "We all do in life. But this is of utmost importance when you have a gun and a badge and you're out there serving the public."
Eyewitness News asked Will Vizzard, a criminal justice professor at Sacramento State University, why there seems to be a spike in drug cases involving officers. He downplayed that perception.
"I don't think you are hearing more and more about officers going bad," Vizzard said. "I think peace officers today are honest or more honest then they ever have been."
Vizzard said implementation of random drug testing would depend on one department to the next.
"I'm not at all opposed to it, certainly. It's something that should be considered," Vizzard said in an interview via Skype.
The topic of random drug testing for the sheriff's office is now before the Kern Law Enforcement Association, which represents the deputies. Its initial stance has been overwhelmingly positive.
"Our board met and discussed this issue, and the majority of the board is completely in support of random drug testing for illicit narcotics, illicit drugs," said KLEA president Marc Hiungs.
As for the Bakersfield Police Officers Association, its president said it is neither for nor against random drug testing, and that random drug testing hasn't been discussed as an issue.
7 answers - Asked By: CHECK MY PROFILE®⚑ - 2/3/2012 |
| |
| My friend told me the police pulled her over. She had weed on her, like a couple of nickels. She told me the police officer told her he didn't want to arrest her. He said "you better tell me if you have any drugs in the car. Do you? If you tell me the truth I won't lock you up I will let you go but if I find out your lying and I find drugs then I won't let you go and I'll arrest you. She admitted yes to the officer and handed over the weed so he would let her go like he said he would and she said she was sorry she won't do it again. Of course he arrested her anyway. He continued to call back up. About 7 other police squad cars arrived and the chief of the police district like there was a murder or somethin, and they had female officers search her body and they searched the car. The female officers made her take her clothes off outside in the back side of the police car. She had to pull her panties down and everything and take her shirt, bra and shoes and socks off. Then they arrested her and she was in jail all night til' the morning. She wasn't bothering anyone and she is a really sweet person. I never heard of anything like this. Doesn't she have a right to privacy? They ended up arresting her anyway and impounding her car. Is there a name for this like arrested by deception or something? Also shouldn't she have a right to privacy? Why would she have to strip almost naked for them. I heard on a jail show on cable in some states in the U.S. (like California) it's illegal to do a strip search and the police can lose their job if they do it. Violation of right to privacy from the HIPPA act law. I know weed is illegal and they did have to arrest her but they could have let her go if they really wanted to like they said they would. The point is they deceived her to get her to admit it and they tricked her. What is this called and can she sue the police and the city for this?
@Lam but I don't understand at all. Hypothetically speaking, If my friend hadn't told them where the weed was and didn't hand it over, they would have found it anyway and they still would have locked her up so can you please explain further?
|
| |
 | A man about the age of 25 tried to break into my sisters home a few months back. It was only her and her 3 year old child home as the man tried to kick in the door then went to two of the bedroom windows and tried to open them, then went back to the front door and proceeded to try to kick it in again. My sister called the police and by the time they got there the man had entered through a privacy fence into the back yard. The police told my sister that the man was mentally disabled and that he could not be held accountable for his actions. After a long argument about "what could have happened if he had gotten in" the police took him an told my sister that he would be arrested and released to his mothers care. They did not arrest him or file charges even though they told my sister they would. Well no more then an hour ago she came home from work and found him in the back yard yet again. She called the police and they wont do anything about it. Something has to be done theres no reason anyone should have to live in fear in there own home. Can someone tell me what to do?
|
| |
| How do you feel about an illegal who used stolen id & police dept hired him to work as cop will all his arrests be dismissed ? ANCHORAGE, Alaska—
An Anchorage Police officer has been serving under an assumed name and is in the country illegally, the U.S. District Attorney's Office says.
Rafael Mora-Lopez, 51, is charged with a false application of passport, using the name Rafael Espinoza to apply or re-apply for a passport in January. When the application was made, it was discovered by the Department of State that duplicate passports with the same information existed.
Anchorage police say Mora-Lopez, who is actually a Mexican citizen, had been with the Anchorage Police Department as Rafael Espinoza since May of 2005.
The Department and the U.S. Attorney’s Office would not say how long Mora-Lopez had been in Alaska or the U.S., or how long he had been using Espinoza’s name, saying that many details would not come out until trial because it is an ongoing investigation.
U.S. Attorney Karen Loeffler said charges were brought Thursday, and Mora-Lopez was arrested the same day. “It came to our attention and was resolved in about 24 hours,” Anchorage Police Chief Mark Mew said.
Mew emphasized that, other than the false name, there is no other evidence of wrongdoing on Mora-Lopez’s part. He said Mora-Lopez, as Espinoza, was known as hardworking, professional and was well-respected amongst his colleagues. “The problem is, he is not Rafael Espinoza,” Mew said.
Mew said that the real Rafael Espinoza, a U.S. Citizen, has a “squeaky-clean” record, and that any background check for Mora-Lopez under the assumed name would have showed that clean background. He also said a fingerprint check would not have discovered anything unless Mora-Lopez had been fingerprinted as a criminal or for other employment opportunities and background checks.
Mew did say, however, that Mora-Lopez’s polygraph test, which law enforcement officers take prior to employment, would be examined, if possible.
“It is a career-ending matter,” Mew said.
Mora-Lopez worked on the swing-shift patrol, and Mew said that the other officers on that shift are, “of course, devastated. He’s a core member of that shift.”
He said many officers feel betrayed, and that “it’s a bitter pill to swallow.” Mew characterized Mora-Lopez as “an honest guy who lied his way into a job.”
U.S. Attorney Karen Loeffler said that many details were kept under wraps, both for the privacy of the real Rafael Espinoza and the defendant, Mora-Lopez, and for the sake of the ongoing investigation.
Loeffler emphasized that the matter had only come to light within the last day or so, and that many things were still being sorted out.
False Application of Passport is a federal crime with a 10-year maximum sentence, Loeffler said. She said it is possible that other charges will be brought, but currently, Mora-Lopez is charged with just one count.
Mora-Lopez was arraigned at 3 p.m. Friday. He made a statement, saying, "I was very proud to serve the community."
http://www.ktuu.com/news/ktuu-apd-officer-false-passport-application-20110422,0,1192462.story |
| |
 | So what would you do in my case?
1. I am a very small, slender man. Five foot four, 109 pounds. I have been a victim of violent crime that has required over a week of hospitalization.
2. I cannot leave Los Angeles. I am an elementary school teacher. I am gay, and only two cities in the United States of America provide written contractual tenure protection of my job, Los Angeles and San Francisco.
3. I normally carry a .25 Automatic for self defense.
4. I live and work in high crime areas of Los Angeles.
5. On this forum, I constantly hear derision and ridicule for carrying a .25 Auto.
6. The Police Chief of Los Angeles, Charlie Beck
http://www.exposay.com/celebrity-photos/los-angeles-police-chief-charlie-beck-maldef-AHqDhT.jpg
is also the President of the Local Chapter of Handgun Control Inc. In his keynote address to that organization last January, he bragged about the fact that Los Angeles has 3.8 Million people, and he has only issued 23 Carry Permits.
7. The Sherriff of Los Angeles, Lee Baca,
http://www.lasdcrimeinfo.net/_lasd-images/exec_photos/BACA8X10T2-COPY.jpg
also is a proponent of gun control. Los Angeles County has Ten Million people, and Sheriff Baca has issued approximately 500 gun permits; largely to judges, district attorney investigators, arson investigators, city councilmen, and political contributors to his election campaigns.
8. Los Angeles is underpoliced. Los Angeles has about 10,000 officers, and is the second largest city in America. By contrast, Chicago is the third largest city in America, and has 30,000 officers.
The LAPD deals with gangs and street crimes by sort of overlooking the 4th Amendment protections against unlawful searches. Law enforcement in Los Angeles County, both LAPD and the Sheriff's Office have a policy: Young males in high crime areas WILL be searched for weapons. In areas like downtown, or the subway, or metrolink, police will cordon off an area and search all young males. I have gone through several stop and frisks while riding public transportation.
9. In my experience, the ONLY gun that will pass a cursory street "stop and frisk," is a high quality, compact vintage Colt or Browning .25 Automatic.
http://www.hansenguns.com/images/babybrowning1.JPGhttp://www.icollector.com/images/1160/14675/14675_0542_1_lg.jpghttp://www.gunsamerica.com/userimages/87270/996284015/pop_wm_1493573.jpg
(The current Taurus .25 Autos are too heavy and bulky). I have thus far, successfully passed stop and frisk searches by the Los Angeles Police Department, the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, and the Los Angeles Community College Police.
10. My current method of carrying my weapon , is via pockets I have had sewn into four of my sport coats, which carry the weapon in an unusual place. I live in Los Angeles, in a poor neighborhood, and there are a lot of illegal alien women who normally do sewing piecework at home for money, and I am used to have all my clothes custom taylored for me. For example, I am very slender, and it is my habit to have all my clothes taken in for a better fit. So it was a simple matter for me to have a few extra pockets sewn in to my jackets, although I am sure it must have puzzled the seamstresses as to why I wanted the pockets.
11. So what would YOU do in my case, instead of carrying a .25 Automatic?
LAPD ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS checks for ankle holsters. ALWAYS. Know why? They are a FELONY in California. It is an EASY way to get a gang member off the street.
King George.
If you open carry in Los Angeles, you will at the very least, spend the night in Los Angeles County Jail. You cannot open carry in Los Angeles. I don't know what anyone has told you, but you cannot do that here. You will be arrested. Period.
|
| |
| Http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/01/13/33282.htm
-
SAN DIEGO (CN) - The San Diego police chief and sheriff violated a woman's privacy and civil rights by inviting three TV crews to accompany officers as they arrested her and searched her car and apartment, then threw her in jail for 5 days for alleged crimes against the elderly, though the cops had a photo all along that showed she "clearly" was not the woman they sought, Deidria Nicholson claims in Federal Court. The real suspect was already in jail, Nicholson says, and "the only similarity between the suspect and Deidria Nicholson was that they were both heavy-set black women."
Nicholson says the city and county cops staged the televised arrest after "an anonymous caller contacted the police and told them that the suspect looked like" her.
So in April 2010, police got a warrant to search her home and "brought camera crews from three different television stations to film the search," Nicholson says. Police allowed the camera crews into "a private area" of her apartment complex, to "film and broadcast" while police searched her car. Police then "rummaged through the entire house and took letters, bills and other financial documents," and her computer, Nicholson says.
Police and sheriff's officers were search a woman for "a series of frauds and thefts" against elderly people. Nicholson says the TV stations - which are not named as defendants - broadcast film of her arrest for days while she sat in jail.
All along, Nicholson says, police had a photo of a suspect who was "clearly" not her, and they found no evidence in their search to justify the arrest.
Police had been "investigating a series of frauds and thefts committed by a woman whose image was captured on video surveillance," according to the complaint. The "crimes were committed against the elderly" and attracted "significant media attention."
"The news of Ms. Nicholson's arrest aired for several days," accompanied by video footage of Nicholson being taking into custody. Because of the exposure, Nicholson says, she had to be placed in protective custody.
"The real criminal, Cassandra Henry, had been arrested in Claremont, California days earlier for these crimes," Nicholson says.
At her arraignment, Nicholson's family showed the prosecution the photo of the suspect - "who was clearly not Deidria Nicholson," the complaint states. Prosecutors then dropped the charges against Nicholson.
Nicholson says the police refused to return her computer for several months.
She sued the City of San Diego, its police department, San Diego County, its Sheriff Bill Kolender, and police trainer William Lansdowne.
She demands damages for civil rights violations, failure to properly train, failure to supervise and discipline, false imprisonment, emotional distress, media intrusion, negligence and violations of the Unruh Act.
She is represented by Eugene Iredale and Julia Yoo.
3 answers - Asked By: CHECK MY PROFILE®⚑ - 1/13/2011 |
| |
 | I just read an article on CNN.com speculating on the possibility. I realize this question is going to draw some immediate and very strong comments on both sides. I'm interested in some of the more thoughtful comments I hope the question will generate.
Personally, I feel Bill Clinton would be a very good choice for a Supreme Court justice. When I say this, I'm well aware that the SCOTUS is a non-political job. Despite what some people might think about his personal politics or his "indiscretions", I happen to think Bill is one of the most intelligent public figures in the US and his education and experience would be more than adequate for judging the constitutionality of various cases. Especially given that most cases are not hot button political issues.
Related article: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/04/justice.clinton/index.html
For Captainspalding: Keep in mind that an impeachment is only an indictment. Bill was acquitted of the charges by the Senate. Don't get me wrong, I realize his political baggage would keep him from being confirmed even if nominated. But I do think it's an interesting question.
|
| |
| (this senario question is for both sides, im going to use the canadain version as i am canadian.)
the us and canada share these info systems with each other at border crossings. for canada, all the info on the cpic changes every day with new additions of criminal records and record removals from canadian pardons. does the us download all cpic info daily, monthly etc. into their system so that even if someone gets a canadian pardon removing all cpic records, the record still shows up because it was downloaded before the pardon was granted. or do they only have access at the time of the border check? my friend and i are at odds with who is right over privacy vs security
a criminal record does get completely removed from the cpic. its moved to a separate part of that persons file and not accessible to anyone in law enforcement. only the gov. general and parole board can access that.
i will try to rephrase this, as an example ONLY... i have a criminal record in canada from 1998 (one summary narcotic possession). i want to go to the usa to visit my parents. i have crossed the border only once in 1999. but since 9/11 no body with a record can cross in to the usa, so i have never been to the border after security changed. so i waited and got a pardon removing my record from the cpic system. no traces of it are left for anyone to see, not even that i ever had a record. (i know the record gets kept somewhere else, but to law enforcement its not accessible). so now i have a clean cpic record. nothing at all is on it. now i want to cross the border. when i get there, does the border agent run my name and see nothing (because the pardon removed it) and lets m
1 answer - Asked By: SilverDaze - 10/18/2012 |
| |
| MADISON, Wis. — Agents with the local U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Office of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), in close partnership with the Madison Police Department (MPD), arrested 11 illegal alien gang members and gang associates on Tuesday.
This is the latest joint local action of an ongoing national ICE-HSI effort to target foreign-born members of violent street gangs.
The arrests were made Aug. 11 under an initiative by ICE’s National Gang Unit dubbed “Operation Community Shield.” As part of the initiative, ICE partners with federal, state and local law enforcement agencies across the country to target the significant public safety threat posed by transnational street gangs.
Partnerships with local law enforcement agencies are essential to the initiative’s success, and they help further ensure officer safety during the operations.
All 11 men arrested are members or associates of the Chicano Pride and C-14 street gangs; all are Mexican nationals. They have been charged with administrative immigration violations and are being processed for deportation. Five of those arrested have previous criminal convictions in addition to their immigration violations. Some of their arrests and convictions include: carrying a concealed weapon, resisting or obstructing a police officer, battery, theft and criminal damage to property. For privacy reasons, ICE does not release the names of those arrested on administrative immigration charges.
In addition to the Madison Police Department, ICE received assistance from the following agencies: the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF); the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Wisconsin; and the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS).
“Street gangs pose a growing public safety threat to communities in the Madison area,” said Gary Hartwig, special agent in charge of the ICE-HSI office in Chicago. “With each gang member we arrest and remove from the United States, we're making a positive impact in our communities and improving public safety.”
“The arrests during this joint operation with ICE are consistent with what the MPD has stated in the past: we are focused on removing violent gang members from the streets of Madison,” said Madison Police Chief Noble Wray. “It is a matter of public safety, and we will work in concert with federal authorities to diminish potential threats. This in no way; however, changes our approach and philosophy in dealing with other members of our immigrant communities.”
ICE’s National Gang Unit identifies violent street gangs and develops intelligence on their membership, associates, criminal activities and international movements to deter, disrupt and dismantle gang operations by tracing and seizing cash, weapons and other assets derived from criminal activities.
Through Operation Community Shield, the federal government uses its powerful immigration and customs law enforcement authorities in a coordinated, national campaign against criminal street gangs in the United States. Transnational street gangs have significant numbers of foreign-born members and are frequently involved in human and contraband smuggling, immigration violations and other crimes with a connection to the border.
Since ICE began Operation Community Shield in February 2005, more than 18,000 gang members and associates belonging to more than 900 different gangs have been arrested nationwide.
More information on the National Gang Unit at ICE is available at:
http://www.nbc15.com/news/headlines/100543819.html
Obama Deporting More Illegals Than Bush.One graphic is worth many thousands of words:
But we did. And after clicking on “FY2007-FY2010 Removal Statistics”, the problem with these assertions became stark:
Total Deportations, FY2007-FY2010
Number
?hange
FY2007
291,060
-
FY2008
369,221
26.8?
FY2009
389,834
5.6?
FY2010 (1st 9 months)
279,035
-3.1?)
(a) From same period of the prior FY. Data source: ICE Removals 2007-2010 Excel Spreadsheet
In FY2008—George W. Bush’s last full fiscal year—deportations rose a whopping 26.8?rom the prior year.
And now the rate of deportations in has actually turned negative. As things stand now, Fiscal 2010, which started on October 1, 2009 and is Obama’s first full year, is on course to be the first since FY2002 in which deportations will have declined.
http://vdare.com/rubenstein/100809_nd.htm6 answers - Asked By: THE GREATEST GODDESS JILL - 8/12/2010 |
| |